摘要
"一事不再理"是《民事诉讼法》的一项基本原则。在民事诉讼中确当适用此原则,关系着效率与公平价值目标的平衡之实现。在中国的民事诉讼理论和实践中,长期以来存在的理论含混与实践芜杂,对此原则的地位和效用形成了一定减损。"一事不再理"原则,亟须在书面上和实践中予以澄清。借由对"一事不再理"原则在书面和实践中的双向考察和彼此印证,我们可以获得澄清此原则的启示:对"一事"之判定应立足于后诉之实体法上诉讼目的是否为前诉所覆盖或吞并;对"不再理"范围之扩张或限缩,需以程序保障权的落实为前提。
The ne bis in idem principle is a fundamental principle in the Civil Procedural Law of the People's Republic of China. Appropriate application of the principle in civil actions relates to the balance between values of efficiency and justice. In the Chinese civil procedure there have been long-termed ambiguities in theory and confusions in practice, which undermine the role and effect of the principle and therefore the principle needs clarification. By exploring and verifying it in theory and practice, we might shed light upon the principle to achieve the goal of clarification. When deciding whether it's a new litigation, the standpoint is that whether the purpose of the litigation has been overridden by its predecessor. When enlarging or limiting the concept of “re-proceeding”, the premise is the right of due process has been ensured.
作者
梁开斌
LIANG Kai-bin(Law School, Fujian University of Technology, Fuzhou 350108, Fujian, China)
出处
《华南理工大学学报（社会科学版）》
2019年第3期66-80,共15页
Journal of South China University of Technology(Social Science Edition)
基金
国家社科基金后期资助项目"论诉之牵连"(17FFX008)
关键词
一事不再理
既判力
诉讼系属
诉讼目的
ne bis in idem
res judicata
lis pendens
purpose of litigation
