期刊文献+

乳腺癌改良根治术中肋间臂神经保留的可行性与安全性分析 被引量:23

Feasibility and safety analysis of intercostal brachial nerve preservation in modified radical mastectomy for breast cancer
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨乳腺癌改良根治术中肋间臂神经保留的可行性与安全性。方法乳腺癌改良根治术病人60例,按是否行肋间臂神经保留分成两组,试验组34例,术中对肋间臂神经进行保留;对照组26例,术中未行肋间臂神经保留。比较两组的手术及住院情况、感觉功能障碍量化评分、术后感觉改变部位、病人的生活质量评分(QOL)、并发症、随访1年的复发率。结果试验组手术时间(110.45±27.53)min,术中出血量(115.76±23.13)ml、淋巴结清扫数目为(12.65±2.77);对照组分别为(102.37±26.15)min、(108.55±21.49)ml和(11.78±2.52),两组比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。试验组住院时间为(7.49±1.32)d,对照组为(8.42±1.45)d,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。试验组术后1个月、3个月、6个月的感觉功能障碍量化评分分别为(2.04±0.71)、(2.87±0.84)和(3.25±1.06),对照组分别为(1.63±0.54)、(2.12±0.72)和(2.56±0.93),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。试验组腋窝、上臂前侧、后侧、内侧、外侧的感觉改变率分别为14.71%、5.88%、11.76%、8.82%和2.94%,对照组分别为34.62%、26.92%、23.08%和30.77%、15.38%,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。试验组QOL总分为(41.35±6.84),对照组为(32.45±5.67)(P<0.05)。试验组并发症发生率为14.71%,对照组为11.54%,两组比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。试验组随访1年的复发率为8.82%,对照组为7.69%,两组比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论乳腺癌改良根治术中保留肋间臂神经,可提高患者术后感觉功能,且对手术效果和并发症的发生无明显影响,具有较高的可行性与安全性。 Objective To study the feasibility and safety analysis of intercostal brachial nerve preservation in modified radical mastectomy for breast cancer.Methods The data of sixty patients with modified radical mastectomy were retrospectively analyzed.Thirty-four patients who underwent intraoperative intercostobrachial nerve preservation were set as the study group.Twenty-six patients who did not had intercostal brachial nerve preservation during the operation were set as the control group.The situation of operation and hospitalization,the quantitative score of sensory dysfunctions,the location of postoperative sensory changes,quality of life score(QOL),complications and recurrence rate of one year follow-up for cancer patients were compared between the two groups.Results The operation time of the experimental group(110.45±27.53)min,intraoperative blood loss(115.76±23.13)ml,lymph node dissection(12.65±2.77)and control group was(102.37±26.15)min,(108.55±21.49)ml and(11.78±2.52),respectively(P>0.05).The length of hospital stays in the experimental group[(7.49±1.32)d] was significantly lower than that in the control group[(8.42±1.45)d](P<0.05).The quantitative scores of sensory dysfunctions in the experimental group at 1 month,3 months,and 6 months were(2.04±0.71),(2.87±0.84),and(3.25±1.06),respectively,which were significantly higher than those in the control group[(1.63±0.54),(2.12±0.72) and(2.56±0.93),respectively](P<0.05).The sensory change rates of the axilla,anterior,posterior,medial and lateral sides of the experimental group were 14.71%,5.88%,11.76%,8.82%,and 2.94%,respectively,which were significantly lower than those of the control group[34.62%,26.92%,23.08%,30.77%,15.38%](P<0.05).The total score of QOL in the experimental group(41.35±6.84)was significantly higher than that in the control group(32.45±5.67)(P<0.05).The incidence of complications in the experimental group was 14.71%,which was not significantly different from the complication rate in the control group( 11. 54%)( P > 0. 05). The recur
作者 朱加猛 ZHU Jiameng(Department of General Surgery,Shuyang Affiliated Hospitalof Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine ( Shuyang Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine),Suqian,223600,China)
出处 《临床外科杂志》 2019年第3期214-217,共4页 Journal of Clinical Surgery
关键词 乳腺癌 改良根治术 肋间臂神经 感觉功能 并发症 breast cancer modified radical intercostobrachial nerve sensory function complications
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

二级参考文献130

  • 1米玮,朱艳,刘力.保留肋间臂神经的改良乳腺癌根治术[J].现代肿瘤医学,2006,14(10):1221-1222. 被引量:13
  • 2陈克能,Peirong Yu.外科多专业合作胸壁切除与重建术在乳腺癌侵犯胸壁患者治疗中的地位[J].中华肿瘤杂志,2006,28(11):856-859. 被引量:11
  • 3游国雄 竺士秀 张可经.失眠与睡眠障碍疾病[M].北京:人民军医出版社,2002.33-6. 被引量:5
  • 4魏源水,朱宏辉,倪斌,等.保留胸前神经和肋间臂神经的乳腺癌改良根治术疗效分析[J].湖南师范大学学报(医学版)2011,8(4):31-33. 被引量:1
  • 5Zhang B, Li Y, Chen M, et al. Association study of susceptibility loci with specific breast cancer subtypes in Chinese women [ J ]. Breast Cancer Res Treat,2014,146 ( 3 ) :503-514. 被引量:1
  • 6Topaz M, Carmel NN, Silberman A, et al. The TopClosure I 3 S System, for skin stretching and a secure wound closure[ J]. Eur J Plast Surg, 2012,35 (7) :533-543. 被引量:1
  • 7Macdonald SM, Harris EE, Arthur DW, et al. ACR appropriateness cri- teria locally advanced breast cancer [ J ]. Breast J, 2011 , 17 ( 6 ) : 579-585. 被引量:1
  • 8Drake DB, Oishi SN. Wound healing considerations in chemotherapy and radiation therapy [ J ]. C lin Plast Surg, 1995,22 (1) :31-37. 被引量:1
  • 9Deo SV,Purkayastha J, Shukla NK, et al. Myocutaneous versus thora- co-abdominal flap cover for soft tissue defects following surgery for lo- cally advanced and recurrent breast cancer [J]. J Surg Oncol,2003, 83(1) :31-35. 被引量:1
  • 10Contant CM, van Geel AN, van der Holt B, et al. The pedicled omento- plasty and split skin graft ( POSSG ) for reconstruction of large chest wall defects. A validity study of 34 patients [ J]. Eur J Surg Oneol, 1996,22(5) :532-537. 被引量:1

共引文献121

同被引文献181

引证文献23

二级引证文献52

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部