摘要
沈新林的《〈红楼梦〉原作者非曹雪芹论》一文得出《红楼梦》的原作者只能是曹寅养子曹颜的结论,"自叙传"说是其立论的基石,从这个前提出发已带有沙上建塔的风险,其后的论证与推断罅漏颇多。与沈氏商榷之余,本文亦从稗史关系、小说文体的发展演变、小说的虚构性三个角度入手对"考证""索隐"等小说研究派别所要解决的问题本身以及研究路径作出反思。
Shen Xinlin’s essay The original author of Dream of Red Mansions is not Cao XueQin which have been published on The Journal Ming And Qing Dynasties Novel Research NO.1,2018 came to the conclusion that the original author of Dream of Red Mansions can only be Cao Yan. The theoretical foundation of this essay is “autobiograghic theory",from this premise his demonstration has been unreliable. And what’s more,his following argumentation and inference have many careless omissions. Beyond the deliberation with Shen Xinlin,the author try to rethink the problem itself which“Suoyin Group”and “Textual Criticiam Group”want to solve and their research approach from three angles:“the relationship between novel and history”“development and evolution of novel style”“the fabrication of novel”.
出处
《文学与文化》
2019年第1期51-60,共10页
Literature and Culture Studies
关键词
《红楼梦》
原作者
稗史关系
小说文体
虚构性
Dream of Red Mansions
Original Author
the Relationship between Novel and History
Novel Style
Fabrication
