摘要
目的:全面检测简体中文版疼痛自我效能量表(SC-PSEQ)在下腰痛(LBP)人群中的信度与效度,并为临床提供证据支持。方法:共4家医院的86例LBP患者参与本研究,参与者独立完成SC-PSEQ、疼痛数字打分、Oswestry功能障碍指数、Roland-Morris功能障碍调查表、健康调查简表等自评问卷。结果:86名参与者SC-PSEQ平均得分(46.29±11.16)分,与中间值30间存在统计学差异(t=13.535,P<0.001),10.47%患者得分为满分60分。因子分析提示SC-PSEQ为单维问卷,可解释61.56%的变异。该问卷内部一致性(Cronbach'sα=0.929)与重复测量信度(ICC=0.852,P<0.001)均较高。结论:SC-PSEQ具有与原版一致的信效度水平,可考虑调整问卷内容以降低潜在的天花板效应。
Objective: To test the reliability and validity of the pain self-efficacy questionnaire in simplified Chinese version(SC-PSEQ) in patients with low back pain. Methods: A total of 86 participants with low back pain were recruited in four hospitals.They independently completed the simplified Chinese version of pain self-efficacy questionnaire, Numeric Pain Rating Scale, Oswestry Disability Index, Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire, 36-Item Short Form Health Survey. Results: The average score of all the participants was(46.29±11.16), which was statistically different from the median score of SC-PSEQ(t=13.535, P<0.001). In addition,10.47% of them were scored with the maximum possible score. Factor analysis indicated that the SC-PSEQ was unidimensional and61.56% variance could be explained with the one factor. The questionnaire also had high level of internal consistency(Cronbach’sα=0.929) and test-retest reliability(ICC=0.852, P<0.001). Conclusion: The SC-PSEQ has consistent level of measurement properties with the original English version. Appropriate adjustment for its items may reduce the extent of ceiling effect.
作者
白钟飞
屈萌艰
丁恩奇
赵庆贺
夏伟力
舒甜
陆佳妮
BAI Zhongfei;QU Mengjian;DING Enqi;ZHAO Qinghe;XIA Weili;SHU Tian;LU Jiani(Shanghai Yangzhi Rehabilitation Hospital (Shanghai Sunshine Rehabilitation Center),Shanghai 201619,China;The First Affiliated Hospital of University of South China,Hengyang,Hunan 421001,China;Chifeng Municipal Hospital,Chifeng,Inner Mongolia 024000,China;Taian City Central Hospital,Taian,Shandong 271000,China)
出处
《康复学报》
CSCD
2019年第1期58-62,74,共6页
Rehabilitation Medicine
基金
上海市残联康复科研项目(K2016028)
关键词
下腰痛
自我效能
功能障碍
因子分析
信度
效度
low back pain
self-efficacy
dysfunction
factor analysis
reliability
validity
