期刊文献+

为何参与武装干涉?——冷战后北欧国家对外政策转变路径分析 被引量:3

The Reasons for the Nordic Countries' Move towards Armed Intervention——An Analysis of the Transition of Nordic Countries' Foreign Policy after the Cold War
原文传递
导出
摘要 国内既有研究较少讨论北欧国家"小国军事化行动"倾向的产生原因。冷战结束后,美国和北约主导的武装干涉行动全程都有北欧国家的参与,其中丹麦对武力的使用更有显著的偏好。这挑战了国际社会对北欧社群"和平中立"的传统认知。随着国际关系理论的发展以及对小国关注度的提高,对北欧国家的研究也不能仅限于社会民主福利的讨论。本文借助第三类新古典现实主义理论,分析了国际体系层面提供给北欧国家的信息范围和性质,认为冷战后国际格局的变化刺激了北欧国家的对外政策转向。它们将整合后的单元层次因素视为干预变量,增强或扭曲了体系刺激,造成了冷战结束后北欧国家采取整体追随美国和北约,但在具体实践中又产生分野的不同战略取向。 The tendency of taking recourse to military means as the first choice in Nordic countries is a topic that has generally been neglected by the academics.After the Cold War,figures of Nordic countries can be seen in almost every armed intervention led by the US and NATO,among which we can find that Denmark has a significant preference for the use of force and which has posed a challenge to the traditional perception of the Nordic countries as actors insisting on the principle of peace and neutrality.Inspired by the Third Category of Neo-classical realist theory,this paper takes the international system as the first driving force and concludes that the transition of the international pattern has changed the security environment of Nordic countries,who have viewed the integrated unit level as an intervention variable.Finally,this paper discusses the Nordic countries’different attitudes toward the US and NATO,as well as their different approaches to participation in military operations.
作者 彭世卿 PENG Shiqing
出处 《欧洲研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2019年第1期45-67,I0004,共24页 Chinese Journal of European Studies
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献250

  • 1何英.试论中美关系是洛克文化的建构[J].南京师大学报(社会科学版),2005(5):61-65. 被引量:5
  • 2尼古拉斯.G.奥努弗,孙吉胜.建构主义的哲学渊源探析[J].世界经济与政治,2006(9):58-66. 被引量:19
  • 3M. Kautto et al. eds. , Nordic Welfare States in the European Context, London and New York: Routledge, 2001, p. 1. 被引量:1
  • 4W. Korpi, The Democratic Class Struggle, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul., 1983 被引量:1
  • 5E. Huber and J. D. Stephens, "Internationalization and the Social Democratic Model", pp. 353 - 398 被引量:1
  • 6C. Pierson, "Contemporary Challenges to Welfare State Development", Political Studies, Vol. XLVI, 1998, pp. 777 -794 被引量:1
  • 7M. Kautto et al. eds. , Nordic Welfare States in the European Context. 被引量:1
  • 8R. Rose,'' Common Goals But Different Roles: The State's Contribution to the Welfare Mix'', in R. Rose & Rei Shiratori eds. , The Welfare State East and West, New York:Oxford University Press, 1986, pp. 13 - 39 被引量:1
  • 9Also see A. Evers, "Shifting in the Weffare Mix - Introducing a New Approach for the Study of Transformation in Welfare and Social Policy", in Adalbert Evers and Helmut Wintersberger eds. , Shifts in the Welfare Mix, Frankfurt: Campus, 1988, pp. 7 - 30. 被引量:1
  • 10R. Wuthnow ed. , Between State and Markets : The Voluntary Sector in Comparative Perspective, Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1991, pp. 5-7. 被引量:1

同被引文献61

引证文献3

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部