摘要
以生态语言学溯源为基础,探讨了"豪根模式"与"韩礼德模式"生态语言学研究方法,分析了日本学者冈崎敏雄与宇都宫裕章关于生态语言学的研究。结果表明:冈崎在"豪根模式"的基础上提出了构建可持续性多语言环境的主张,把"尊重语言与语言之间的接触过程中所生成的多样性"视作生态语言学研究的重点。宇都宫把吉布森的生态心理学与皮尔士的"三元关系"符号学相联系,主张从重视可用性的角度出发,在有机体与环境的不断交互过程中把握语义,并对认知语言学把意义的形成完全看成是主体对世界的概念化的观点进行了批判。两位日本生态语言学研究者的主张需要完善之处颇多,尽管如此,冈崎与宇都宫的观点仍有诸多值得借鉴之处与理论价值,对生态语言学的积极思考与探索值得我国相关学者借鉴和思考。
The study discussed the origin of ecolinguistics, outlined the approaches to ecolinguistics formulated by Einar Haugen and Michael Halliday, and analyzed the ecolinguistics study of Japanese scholars OKAZAKI Toshio and UTSUNOMIYA Hiroaki. OKAZAKI Toshio points out that it is highly necessary to build a sustainable multi-lingual ecology in order to protect the language diversity through the process of language contact. Basing on Peirce′s theory of signs, UTSUNOMIYA Hiroaki gives a semiotic interpretation of Gibson′s concept of affordances, and he argues that meaning is the interpretant of affordance. Although the viewpoint from OKAZAKI Toshio and UTSUNOMIYA Hiroaki need to be ameliorated, there is much to be learnt from it. The positive thinking and exploration of ecolinguistics is worthy of reference and consideration by relevant scholars in China.
作者
赵无忌
Zhao Wuji(School of Foreign Language,South China Agricultural University,Guangzhou Guangdong 510642,China)
出处
《西南林业大学学报（社会科学）》
CAS
2017年第4期99-103,110,共6页
Journal of Southwest Forestry University(Social Sciences)
