5Ariel Ezrachi, David Gilo: "Excessive Pricing, Entry, Assessment and Investment Lessons from the Mittal Litigation" ,Antitrust Law Journal, Vol. 76, No. 3, p. 873, 2010. 被引量：1
6Excessive prices are defined in Section 1 (1)(ix) of the South African Competition Act as "a price for a good or service which (aa) bears no reasonable relation to the economic value of that good or service, and (bb) is higher than the value referred to in subparagraph (aa)". 被引量：1
7Section 19: An abuse exists in particular if a dominant undertaking as a supplier or purchaser of certain kinds ofgoods or commercial services: […] demands payment or other business terms which differ from those which would very likely arise if effective competition existed effective competition existed; Section 29An undertaking, which is a supplier of electricity or pipeline gas (public utility company) on a market inwhich it, either alone or together with other public utility companies, has a dominant position, is prohibitedfrom abusing such position by […] demanding fees which unreasonably exceed the costs. 被引量：1
8Monopolistically high price of the goods is the price fixed by an economic entity with dominant position, if this price exceeds the sum of the necessary production and distribution costs of the goods and profit, and exceeds the price formed under competitive conditions in the goods market, with comparable composition of goods buyers or sellers, conditions of goods circulation, market entry conditions, government regulation, including taxation and customs-and-tariffs regulation. 被引量：1
9Article 102 TFEU"Any abuse by one or more undertakings of a dominant position within the internal market or in a substantial part of it shall be prohibited as incompatible with the internal market in so far as it may affect trade between Member States. Such abuse may, in particular, consist in: (a) directly or indirectly imposing unfair purchase or selling prices or other unfair trading conditions;. 被引量：1
