摘要
目的比较不同手术治疗方式治疗腹股沟疝气的临床效果。方法选取2013年1月—2016年12月时间内来扬州市第三人民医院和苏北人民医院的72例腹股沟疝气患者随机分为观察组与对照组2组,对照组行常规疝修补术治疗,观察组行无张力疝气修补术治疗,对比两组患者的治疗效果。结果观察组患者手术时间(45.81±2.16)min、出血量(10.16±1.46)mL、住院时间(5.60±0.43)d、治疗有效率97.22%、VAS(2.62±0.02)分、SF-36(80.01±0.19)分,患者未见切口感染,与对照组差异有统计学意义(t=50.602 1,13.981 1,97.710 8,χ~2=2.909 1,t=160.801 1,219.813 8,P<0.05)。结论行无张力疝气修补术治疗腹股沟疝气,手术时间短、术中出血量少、术后恢复快。
Objective To compare the clinical effects of different surgical treatments for inguinal hernia.Methods 72 patients with inguinal hernia who came to Third People's Hospital and Subei People's Hospital from January 2013 to December 2016 were randomly divided into observation group and control group.The control group underwent conventional hernia repair.The observation group underwent tension-free hernia repair and compared the therapeutic effects of the two groups.Results The operation time(45.81±2.16)min,blood loss(10.16±1.46)mL,hospitalization time(5.60±0.43)d,treatment efficiency 97.22%,VAS(2.62±0.02)points,SF-36(80.01±0.19)points in the observation group,no incision infection was found in the patients,which was significantly different from the control group(t=50.602 1,13.981 1,97.710 8,χ^2=2.909 1,t=160.801 1,219.813 8,P<0.05).Conclusion Tension-free hernia repair for inguinal hernia,short operation time,less intraoperative blood loss and quick recovery after operation.
作者
肖云龙
汤劲松
XIAO Yun-long;TANG Jin-song(Department of General Surgery,Third People's Hospital of Yangzhou,Yangzhou,Jiangsu Province,225125 China;General Surgery,Jiangsu Subei People's Hospital,Yangzhou,Jiangsu Province,225001 China)
出处
《系统医学》
2018年第24期111-113,共3页
Systems Medicine
关键词
无张力疝修补术
常规疝气修补术
腹股沟疝气
出血量
手术时间
并发症
Tension-free hernia repair
Conventional hernia repair
Inguinal hernia
Bleeding volume
Operation time
Complications
