摘要
弗雷格难题的解答方案基本上都遵循了这样一条思路:或以某种方式,或引入某些术语来解释A=A和A=B在认知价值上的区别。从带色标的存在图看弗雷格难题的解题思路,首先,要站在反涵义论的立场上将存在图的同一线作为类似于克里普克的专名,即同一线没有涵义。其次,借用法恩在协同模式理论中引入的"出现"的概念,规定等号连接的是出现,并且给每次出现命名。再次,引入色标这一图式装置,将色标作为模态算子。最后,将"晨星和暮星"问题作为一个应用案例,阐述带色标的存在图是如何为弗雷格难题提供了一个新的解题视角。
The solutions to Frege’s puzzle basically follow a line of thought:either in some way or by introducing certain terms to explain the difference between A=A and A=B in cognitive value.From the existential graphs with tinctures to see Frege’s problem solving ideas,first of all,we should stand in the position of anti-semantics and regard lines of identity of existential graphs as proper names similar to Kripke’s,that is,lines of identity have no meaning.Secondly,by borrowing the concept of“appearing”introduced by Fine’s theory,it is stipulated that the symbolic connection is appearing and each appearing is named.Thirdly,tinctures are used as the modal operators.Finally,“the Morning Star and Evening Star problem”is taken as an application case to illustrate how the existential graphs with tinctures provide a new perspective for solving Frege’s puzzles.
作者
杨武金
程橙
YANG Wu-jin;CHENG Cheng(School of Philosophy, Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872, China)
出处
《河北大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》
北大核心
2018年第6期33-39,共7页
Journal of Hebei University(Philosophy and Social Science)
基金
国家社会科学基金重大项目"广义逻辑悖论的历史发展
理论前沿与跨学科应用研究"(18ZDA031)
