摘要
因刑事缺席审判属于对被告人权利保障克减的情形,因此对缺席审判制度应进行系统性制度构建,以实现刑事诉讼中的程序正义要求。首先,需要通过送达确保被告人知晓缺席审判程序以保障程序选择权。其次,被告人近亲属在缺席审判程序中可作为利害关系人、证人,同时可代表被告人利益代为行使部分权利。再次,缺席审判与没收违法所得程序的具体衔接上应区分具体的类型,分别处理。最后,缺席审判制度应有特殊救济权。被告人归案或判决后对程序提出异议的,应由检察机关重新起诉后再行审理。
As criminal default judgment may jeopardize the legal rights of the criminal defendant,the default judgment mechanism shall be holistically constructed to fulfill the procedual justice in criminal proceedings.First of all,the service of summons shall assure the criminal defendant s adequate knowledge about the default judgment procedure to safeguard his/her right of choice of procedures.Secondly,the immediate relatives of the criminal defendant can serve multiple roles in the default judgment procedure.including interested parties,witnesses,etc.They can also exercise part of the criminal defendants legal rights for and on behalf of the criminal defendant.Thirdly,the connection between the default judgment procedure and illegal income confiscation procedure should be categorized and addressed by a case-by-case approach.Lastly,there should be special remedies in the default judgment mechanism.Once the criminal defendant raised objection against the procedure after the arrest or judgment,the prosecutors should re-open the prosecution process for re-trial.
作者
张澎
姜金良
Zhang Peng;Jiang Jinliang
出处
《中国社会科学院研究生院学报》
CSSCI
北大核心
2018年第6期96-103,共8页
Journal of Graduate School of Chinese Academy of Social Sciences
基金
国家重大社会科学基金项目"中国特色反腐败国家立法体系建设重大理论与现实问题研究"(17ZDA135)的阶段性成果
关键词
刑事缺席审判制度
程序知晓
重新审理
criminal default judgment mechanism
knowledge of procedure
re-trial