期刊文献+

论刑事缺席审判制度的具体构建——以《刑事诉讼法(修正案)》为基础 被引量:17

The Specific Construction of Criminal Default Judgment Mechanism:Based on the Amendment to the Criminal Procedure Law
原文传递
导出
摘要 因刑事缺席审判属于对被告人权利保障克减的情形,因此对缺席审判制度应进行系统性制度构建,以实现刑事诉讼中的程序正义要求。首先,需要通过送达确保被告人知晓缺席审判程序以保障程序选择权。其次,被告人近亲属在缺席审判程序中可作为利害关系人、证人,同时可代表被告人利益代为行使部分权利。再次,缺席审判与没收违法所得程序的具体衔接上应区分具体的类型,分别处理。最后,缺席审判制度应有特殊救济权。被告人归案或判决后对程序提出异议的,应由检察机关重新起诉后再行审理。 As criminal default judgment may jeopardize the legal rights of the criminal defendant,the default judgment mechanism shall be holistically constructed to fulfill the procedual justice in criminal proceedings.First of all,the service of summons shall assure the criminal defendant s adequate knowledge about the default judgment procedure to safeguard his/her right of choice of procedures.Secondly,the immediate relatives of the criminal defendant can serve multiple roles in the default judgment procedure.including interested parties,witnesses,etc.They can also exercise part of the criminal defendants legal rights for and on behalf of the criminal defendant.Thirdly,the connection between the default judgment procedure and illegal income confiscation procedure should be categorized and addressed by a case-by-case approach.Lastly,there should be special remedies in the default judgment mechanism.Once the criminal defendant raised objection against the procedure after the arrest or judgment,the prosecutors should re-open the prosecution process for re-trial.
作者 张澎 姜金良 Zhang Peng;Jiang Jinliang
出处 《中国社会科学院研究生院学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2018年第6期96-103,共8页 Journal of Graduate School of Chinese Academy of Social Sciences
基金 国家重大社会科学基金项目"中国特色反腐败国家立法体系建设重大理论与现实问题研究"(17ZDA135)的阶段性成果
关键词 刑事缺席审判制度 程序知晓 重新审理 criminal default judgment mechanism knowledge of procedure re-trial
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献17

共引文献169

同被引文献107

引证文献17

二级引证文献14

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部