摘要
《魏书·序纪》与《晋书》等传世史料所见拓跋氏与魏晋间的关系,在叙事详略、事实细节和交往状态等层面皆多有不同,表明了史家的不同立场,同时也留下了不少问题。对魏晋时代的官印进行横向比较可以发现,中央政权对周边少数民族政权颁发的官印数量很多,拓跋氏遗留的几方官印很难用来直接对应某个特定的历史事件。不过,这批官印却是拓跋氏接受西晋官号,以少数民族附属者身份与西晋进行交往的直接证据。在史料记载本身比较简略的情况下,传统的逻辑是寻求不同史料之间的共同点以求扩大证据链条。在处理拓跋民族交往早期史料时,需要注意寻求史料共同点逻辑前提是否确实存在,避免不必要的过度解释。
These differences that drove from historical materials like Weishu Xuji and Jinshu on the bilateral relationship,narrative methods factual details,reciprocal condition,and so on,indicate the historian had different standpoints on the historical events and the historical materials contain many problems.Through horizontal comparison on Tuoba Xianbei legacy official seals,it is hard to conclude that the special official seals concide with special historical event.But these official seals directly demonstrate that Tuoba Xianbei receipt the officer tile of the Western Jin Dynasty,then contact with the Western Jin Dynasty as a subsidiary regime.So with the deficient and brief historical materials,an attention on must be paid on whether this common ground exists or not when expand the evidence chain by seeking it between different historical dates,so that unnecessary excessive interpretation can be avoided.
作者
郭硕
GUO Shuo(School of History and Culture,Sichuan University,Chengdu 610065,China)
出处
《烟台大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2018年第6期76-84,共9页
Journal of Yantai University(Philosophy and Social Science Edition)
基金
中国博士后科学基金第11批特别资助项目"内迁诸族的地域认同与北朝民族融合研究"(2018T110966)
