期刊文献+

住院医师导师考核评价量表的信度与效度研究 被引量:2

Research on Reliability and Validity of Assessment Scale for Residents' Tutors
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:测评住院医师导师考核评价量表的信度和效度。方法:量表信度采用内部信度Cronbachα系数进行测量;效度检验采用内容效度进行测量。结果:信度分析三级指标的Cronbach系数均在0.6~0.8之间,内部信度较好;内容效度系数为0.822。结论:住院医师导师考核评价量表具有良好的信度与效度,是研究住院医师导师遴选、培训、考核评价的重要工具。 Objective:To evaluate the reliability and validity of the assessment scale for residents’tutors.Methods:The reliability of the scale was measured using the internal reliability Cronbach alpha coefficient;the validity test was performed using content validity.Results:The Cronbach alpha coefficients of the three indicators of reliability analysis were between 0.6 and 0.8,and the internal reliability was good.The content validity coefficient was 0.822.Conclusion:The resident tutor assessment scale has good reliability and validity and is an important tool for researching resident tutor selection,training and assessment.
作者 闫慧 徐淑杰 李坤 李爱民 Yan Hui;Xu Shujie;Li Kun;Li Aimin(Science and Education Office of First People’s Hospital Of Lianyungang,Lianyungang Jiangsu,222002;Medical service of MCH Hospital of Lianyungang City,Lianyungang Jiangsu,222002)
出处 《江苏卫生事业管理》 2018年第9期1076-1078,共3页 Jiangsu Health System Management
基金 江苏省住院医师规范化培训管理规范类立项课题(G2016014)
关键词 住院医师 导师 考核评价 信度 效度 Residents’tutors Assessment and Evaluation Reliability Validity
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献25

  • 1Wynd CA,Schmidt B,Schaefer MA.Two quantitative approachesfor estimating content validity[J].Western J Nurs Res,2003,25(5):508–518. 被引量:1
  • 2Lindell MK,Brandt CJ,Whitney DJ.A revised index of interrateragreement for multi-item ratings of a single target[J].Appl PsycholMeasurem,1999,23(2):127–135. 被引量:1
  • 3Lawshe CH.A quantitative approach to content validity[J].Personne Psychol,1975,28(4):563–575. 被引量:1
  • 4Hambleton RK,Swaminathan H,Algina J,et al.Criterion-referencedtesting and measurement:Review of technical issues anddevelopments[J].Rev Educat Res,1978,48(1):11–22. 被引量:1
  • 5Martuza VR.Applying norm-referenced and criterion-referenced measurement in education[M].Boston:Allyn andBacon,1977:275–293. 被引量:1
  • 6Lynn MR.Determination and quantification of content validity[J].Nursing Res,1986,35(6):382–385. 被引量:1
  • 7Davis LL.Instrument review:Getting the most from your panel ofexperts[J].Appl Nurs Res,1992,5(4):194–197. 被引量:1
  • 8Polit DF,Beck CT.The content validity index:are you sure youknow what’s being reported?critique and recommendations[J].Res Nurs Health,2006,29(5):489–497. 被引量:1
  • 9Nora JJ.Causes old and new modes,mechanisms and models.Am Heart J,1993,125:1409 被引量:2
  • 10Hoffman JIE.Congenital heart disease:incidence and inheritance.Ped Clin North Am,1990,37:25 被引量:2

共引文献1095

同被引文献14

引证文献2

二级引证文献23

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部