摘要
目的评价健康老龄化测评工具,为老龄化研究提供参考。方法在中国知网、万方、维普、SinoMed、Web of Science、PubMed数据库中检索,基于COSMIN指南对纳入研究进行评价。结果纳入的14项研究共包含14种健康老龄化测评工具,存在一定的偏倚风险,推荐等级均为B级:9项研究缺少比较拟合指数、塔克-刘易斯指数等涉及结构效度的类似指标;7项研究未进行多组因素分析或者项目功能差异分析;12项研究的组内相关系数或加权Kappa值未报告;12项研究未定义假设。结论应继续完善健康老龄化测评工具,依据测评工具质量评价的指南,规范研究设计和报告,为筛选出优质的测量工具以更准确地评估老龄化水平提供基础。
Objective To evaluate health aging measurement tools and provide a reference for aging research.Methods Such databases as CNKI,Wanfang,VIP,SinoMed,Web of Science,and PubMed,were searched to retrieve publications on healthy aging mea-surement tools.The included tools were evaluated based on Consensus Based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments(COSMIN)guidelines.Results A total of 14 studies totaling 14 healthy aging measurement tools were included;all studies were flawed with a certain bias and graded level B:9 studies lacked comparative fit index,Tucker-Lewis index and other similar indicators related to structure validity;7 studies did not conduct multi-group factor analysis or differential item functioning analysis;intraclass correlation coefficient(ICC)or weighted Kappa values were not reported in 12 studies;12 studies did not define hypotheses.Conclusion The measurement tools of healthy aging should be improved,and the research design and reporting should be standardized according to the quality evaluation guidelines of the measurement instruments,so as to provide the basis for selection of high-quality assessment tools to assess the level of aging more accurately.
作者
金锦珍
王岩
陈冉
王子恒
李春玉
Jin Jinzhen;Wang Yan;Chen Ran;Wang Ziheng;Li Chunyu(School of Medicine,Yanbian University,Yanji 133002,China)
出处
《护理学杂志》
CSCD
北大核心
2023年第11期97-100,108,共5页
Journal of Nursing Science
