摘要
功臣配享帝王太庙是古代朝廷对朝中有功于社稷之臣的最高褒奖,配享功臣的选择也揭橥了当时朝中的政治走向。元祐年间,宋廷择富弼舍王安石、绍圣元年(1094)以王安石配享、绍圣三年(1096)罢富弼配享神宗太庙,均与朝中政局走向密切相关。北宋亡国后,徽宗九子赵构建立南宋。为收揽人心,塑造南宋政权的合法性,并为父兄开脱亡国罪责,王安石及新法成为北宋亡国的替罪羔羊,紧随而来的是王安石被罢配享神宗太庙,恢复以富弼配享的故例。但是《宋史·高宗纪》却记载为罢王安石配享,代之以司马光配享,这显然属于史官误笔所致。然而,此处误笔并非偶然,应与南宋初期崇元祐抑熙丰的政治倾向密切相关,同时这种史源性错误对后世历史书写产生了极为不利的影响。
Being Enshrined in the Ancestral Temples of Emperors was the highest praise for the minister in the dynasty,so the enshrinement service also revealed the political trend in the court.It was closely related to the political upheaval in the court of the Northern Song Dynasty selecting Fu Bi in the early period of Yuan You and Wang Anshi in the first year of Shao Sheng to,and expelling Fu Bi in the third year of Shao Sheng(1096)from the temple of the emperors.Zhao Gou founded the Southern Song Dynasty and wanted to legitimatize it.More importantly,He was eager to evacuate his father and brother from the responsibility of the collapse of the Northern Song Dynasty.Wang Anshi and Xi Ning political reform were chosen by him as the scapegoats.That s why Wang Anshi was removed from the temple of the emperors and Fu Bi returned.However,Songshi·Gaozongji recorded that Sima Guang took the enshrinement place of Wang,which was an obviously a mistake made by the official historian.This mistake was closely related to the political inclination of the early period of Southern Song Dynasty and had a seriously negative influence on the historical writing of later generations.
出处
《北京社会科学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2018年第4期4-13,共10页
Social Sciences of Beijing
基金
国家社会科学基金项目“两宋社会保障体制与社会变迁研究”(12BZS062)
