摘要
列宁在十月革命爆发前夕撰写的《国家与革命》是关于马克思主义国家学说的经典著作,为十月革命的爆发奠定了理论基础。100年来,《国家与革命》不断遭到西方"列宁学"的歪曲和误读,正统马克思主义者对这些歪曲和误读进行了批驳。围绕《国家与革命》展开的理论论争主要涉及五个方面的内容:一是偏离还是继承,即《国家与革命》与马克思主义国家学说的关系;二是马克思还是恩格斯,谁是《国家与革命》的主要思想来源;三是政治断裂还是一以贯之,即《国家与革命》与列宁其他思想和作品的关系;四是暴力还是和平,哪个是《国家与革命》的主题;五是专政还是治理,即《国家与革命》的当代启示。100年后重读《国家与革命》依然具有重大理论和现实意义。
The State and Revolution,written by Lenin on the eve of the outbreak of the October Revolution(1917),is a classic work on Marxist doctrine of state,which laid a theoretical foundation for the outbreak of the October Revolution.This work has been distorted and misinterpreted constantly by Western“study of Lenin”over the part100years,while these misunderstandings have been also refuted and criticized by the orthodox Marxists.The theoretical debates around The State and Revolution mainly involves five aspects:1)deviation or inheritance:the relationship between The State and Revolution and Marxist doctrine of state;2)Marx or Engels:the primary source of thought of The State and Revolution;3)political fracture or consistent coherence:the relationship between The State and Revolution and Lenin’s other thoughts and works;4)violence or peace:the theme of The State and Revolution;5)dictationship or governance:the contemporary inspiration of The State and Revolution.To reread The State and Revolution today after its first publication100years ago is still of great theoretical and practical significance.
出处
《北京行政学院学报》
CSSCI
北大核心
2017年第5期32-38,共7页
Journal of Beijing administration institute
