摘要
文章分析了在制度框架约束下、针对不同污染原因进行的政策工具初始选择,作为政策工具效果表现和影响力呈现的政策应激问题,以及政策工具效果反馈之后综合运用多种政策工具的情况。福建九龙江流域水污染治理实践表明,政策工具选择是一个动态的过程,具有"刺激-应激-反馈"的行为表征,僵化干预与单一政策不能有效解决公共问题,需要基于公共问题所处的社会、政治、经济等环境特点进行多种政策工具的组合治理。
Water pollution governance of river basin has been an important issue in public management.Policy instrument selection(PIS)supplies a valuable perspective to analyze the inherent logic of pollution governance policy development.Based on mutual adaption model and take Jiulong River as a case,this article conceptualizes this logic into a three-stages model including stimulating,working and feeding-back which focuses on the mutual action of stakeholders in water pollution governance.This article analyses the stage of stimulating which stands for the initial PIS within certain institutional context that target different pollution reasons;the influences of policy instructions on stakeholders and policy issues which happen at the working stage,the revising and optimizing resulting from the feedback that leads to integrated use of policy instruments.PIS is dynamic.In order to solve the wicked policy problem,a range of policy instruments based on the context is preferred than the one-fit-for-all solution.
出处
《开放导报》
北大核心
2017年第3期27-32,共6页
China Opening Journal
基金
铜仁学院博士启动基金项目“跨界公共事务府际契约治理研究”(trxy DH1626)
2017年贵州省教育厅社科规划项目“武陵山片区共同开发合约制治理模式研究”(2017gh03)
关键词
水污染治理
政策工具
选择
检验
九龙江流域
Water Pollution Governance
Policy Instrument
Selection
Verification
Jiulong River
