摘要
本文指出 ,在司法和案件审理过程中存在着逆向选择效应 ,它使得在那些最应该发挥作用的场合 ,法律反而不能起到应有作用。作者以北京某基层法院的契约纠纷判决书为研究对象 ,试图通过对原被告的胜诉情况、违约原因及其裁决等方面的分析 ,揭示并解释目前存在于司法过程中的逆向选择效应。作者发现 ,如果缺乏信任和良好法律体系 ,导致诉讼的原因一般不是因为契约的模糊性 ,相反 ,故意违约并引发诉讼更主要是人们的策略性选择。因此 ,原告的高胜诉概率和高违约概率现象并存 ,同时违约案件的案情都比较简单 ,辩护理由也简单 。
The practice of reverse choice exists in the administration of justice and the trial of law cases, making the law ineffective where it should bring its role into full play. By taking the verdicts on contractual disputes by a grassroots court as its object of study and through analyzing winning and losing of plaintiffs and defendants, reasons for contractual defaults and court decisions, the paper reveals and make explanations for he reverse choice in legal proceedings. In the absence of mutual trust and a good legal system, the main factor leading to lawsuit is not usually ambiguity of contract stipulations but intentional violation as a tactical choice. High success rates for the plaintiffs coexist therefore with high contract of violation rates. The state of the cases are very simple, so is the defense; in some cases there is even no defense.
出处
《中国社会科学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2002年第2期31-43,共13页
Social Sciences in China
基金
国家自然科学基金委员会"国家自然科学杰出青年基金"的资助 (资助号 70 0 2 5 2 0 1 )
