摘要
《镇江香醋保护条例》是地方立法探索创新路径的一个案例。在制定过程中,经广泛调研得知,多年以来镇江香醋集体商标与地理标志产品专用标志保护在法律适用上存在冲突,面临诸多问题,假冒注册商标屡禁不止,集体商标、地理标志遭不当使用,法律冲突亟待解决,而其原因是多方面的。对此,在地方立法征求意见中,出现了"统一管理说""同时申请说""商标保护说"和"规范使用说"等多种可能的解决方案。经过研究,集体商标和地理标志产品保护均应当得到法律支持,在两者间取得平衡方为正当,为此条例最终采纳了"规范使用说"之"不得突出使用"意见,从而创造性地制定了集体商标与专用标志保护问题的第15条第2款。这一地方立法案例验证了地方立法创新的合理性,同时表明了地方立法创新必须在"不抵触"原则约束之下且必须符合法律精神,把握规律性,增强针对性。
The Zhenjiang Vinegar Protection Regulation is a case for exploring the innovative path of local legislation.There have been many problems over the past years because of the coexistence of the collective trademark and geographical indication products of Zhenjiang Vinegar,such as the application of the law,the repeatedly counterfeit registered trademarks,the improper use of collective marks or geographical indications,and other legal conflicts.Those problems are caused by various factors.In this regard,some people proposed solutions like a unified management system,concurrent application,trademark protection,standardized use and other possible solutions.This paper suggests that in order to keep the balance between the two parties collective trademark and geographical indication product protection should both be legally supported.This example demonstrates the rationality of the innovative local legislation,and shows that innovative local legislation must be under the constraints of the principle of no conflict and fall in line with the spirit of law.
出处
《地方立法研究》
2017年第2期50-56,共7页
Local Legislation Journal
关键词
地方立法
镇江香醋
集体商标
地理标志
利益平衡
local legislation
Zhenjiang vinegar
collective trademark geographical indication
balance of interests
