摘要
立法论证是针对立法工作中的相关问题而开展的,以专家学者为主要参与者的分析与论证活动。与立法听证不同,专家立法论证更强调专业性、技能性,可为立法者提供参考与决策信息,有助于制定出高质量的法律。立法论证贯穿于立法的整个过程,但最集中体现在立法准备阶段。法学专家是论证立法必要性和可行性的主要主体,是论证法案与制度体系协调性的工程师,也是立法过程中具体问题最佳解决方案的提供者。当前法学专家参与立法论证存在从形式到内容的被动性,从人选到地域的集中性,从专业所属到研究方向的单一性等问题。发挥专家的立法论证价值,权力机关应完善专家参与立法论证的程序,选择专家建立应注意专业、地域、年龄、所在机构等的兼顾;专家立法论证过程一般应在公共舆论平台予以公开,与社会公众立法参与同步展开;专家本人应协调处理好立法论证中本职与兼职、专业性与民主性、责任者与行为者等相关问题;法学专家应加强群体自治,明确自身的社会定位和责任担当,应积极关心并且负责任地参与立法论证,将法治思想以正确的方式渗透在法律规范中。
Targeted at issues related to legislative work, legislative argumentation is the legislative activity of analysis and argumentation with jurisprudential experts as the key participants. Unlike legislative hearings,legislative argumentation of jurisprudential experts attaches more emphasis on professionalism and skills and provides the information of reference and decision for legislators, which therefore facilitates the enactment of high-quality laws. On the one hand, legislative argumentation goes through the whole process of legislation, and is particularly reflected in the legislative preparatory phase. On the other hand, jurisprudential experts are the main legislative entity to demonstrate the necessity and feasibility of legislation and the skilled legislative staff demonstrate the coordination between the legislative documents and system as well as the provider of optimal solutions to specific problems in the legislative process. Currently, their legislative argumentation is confronted with such issues as the inactivity of its form and content, the concentration of candidates and regions, and the unity of professional domains and research fields, etc. As a result, measures should be taken to improve the jurisprudential experts＇ ability of legislative argumentation; authorities should improve the procedure in which the experts are involved to participate in the legislative argumentation; and the attention should be paid to the elements of professionalism, domain, age, and institution etc. in the establishment of talent pool. In addition, the process of legislative argumentation by jurisprudential experts should be disclosed on public platforms and launched simultaneously with social public participation in legislation. Last but not least, in the legislative argumentation, legislative experts should be able to deal with such issues as in the duty of profession or part profession, the duality of professionalism and democracy, along with the roles of responsibility or performativity.In this way, jurisprudent
出处
《四川理工学院学报（社会科学版）》
2016年第1期53-62,共10页
Journal of Sichuan University of Science & Engineering(Social Sciences Edition)
基金
国家社会科学基金资助项目(15BFX008)
关键词
立法论证
科学立法
法学专家
立法专家顾问
立法法
legislative argumentation
scientific legislation
jurisprudential academics
legislative expert consultants
Legislation Law
