摘要
克里普克关于先验偶然命题和后验必然命题的观点 ,是对蒯因关于分析命题和综合命题的观点的进一步推进和具体化。克里普克的先验偶然命题是在特定语言系统之内做出的关于语言系统之外的陈述 ,这从逻辑上说是不恰当的 ;他对后验必然命题的论证立足于某一语言系统 ,但得出了超越该语言系统的结论 ,这在逻辑上也是不合理的。
Kripke's view on the priori contingent and the posteriori necessary propositions is a development and concretization of Quine's view on analytical and synthetic propositions. However Kripke's discussion about the priori contingent propositions is logically unreasonable for he discusses the proposition within a special language system while his conclusion exceeds the language system. His view on posteriori necessary proposition is logically unreasonable either, for he bases his discussion on a special language system and comes to a conclusion that is exceeds the language system.
出处
《内蒙古师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》
2002年第4期86-89,共4页
Journal of Inner Mongolia Normal University：Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition
关键词
克里普克
先验偶然命题
后验必然命题
语言系统
the priori and contingent propositions
the posteriori and necessary propositions
language system
