摘要
本文通过蒯因和卡尔纳普对于分析性的争论说明蒯因对分析性的批判并没有打败卡尔纳普,实际上他们的争论是哲学上方法论之争。
Through analysis of the debate between Quine and Carnap on analyticity, this article tries to prove that the criticism from Quine does not defeat Carnap and concludes that their arguments are the debate of philosophical methodology.
