摘要
古往今来,人们对邓析的“两可之说”存在一些争议,有人认为它是一种诡辩,有人认为它是合情合理的。用塞尔的言语行为理论分析邓析的“两可之说”,其结论是邓析的“两可之说”并不是诡辩。
Through the ages, people disagree with Deng Xi’s Liang Ke Theory. Some think it is sophistry while others hold that it is fair and reasonable. This paper makes an analysis of Liang Ke Theory from the angle of Speech Acts Theory and attempts to examine it from an alternative dimension so as to deepen its understanding and mastery. Finally it comes to the conclusion that Deng Xi’s Liang Ke Theory is not sophistry.
出处
《重庆理工大学学报（社会科学）》
CAS
2007年第5期60-63,共4页
Journal of Chongqing University of Technology（Social Science）
