摘要
目的:对比研究核素心肌灌注显像与门控心室显像（GCBP）对缺血性心肌病诊断治疗的价值.方法:对79例缺血性心肌病进行核素心肌灌注显像与门控心室显像,计算各单项检查诊断的准确率和两项检查联合诊断的准确率,并进行对比分析.结果:两种显像方法单项诊断缺血性心肌病的准确率分别为78.5％、84.8％,联合诊断的准确性为93.7％,单项之间无显著差异（P>0.1）,单项与联合之间有显著差异（P<0.05）.结论:核素心肌灌注显像与门控心室显像联合评价对缺血性心肌病诊断治疗的价值优于单项检查.
Objective: To compare the value of SPECT myocardial perfusion image and gating blood-pool image in diagnosing ischemic cardiomyopathy. Methods: 79 patients with ischemic cardiopathy were studied. All patients underwent 99Tcm-MIBI SPECT myocardial perfusion image and gated cardiac blood-pool image. Compare their accuracy each other and compare with their combine accuracy. Results: The accuracy of SPECT myocardial perfusion image and gated cardiac blood-pool image were 78.5%, 84.8%, their combine accuracy was 93.7%. They had no significant differencebetween them (p>0.1), but there was significant difference with their combine accuracy (p<0.05). Conclusion: The combine image of SPECT myocardial perfusion image and gating cardiac blood-pool image might have more value to the diagnosis of ischemic cardiomyopathy than each of them.
出处
《伤残医学杂志》
2002年第3期23-25,共3页
Medical Journal of Trauma and Disability
关键词
核素心肌灌注显像
门控心室显像
缺血性心肌病
GCBP
诊断
Cardiomyopathy Ischemic SPECT Myocardial perfusion image Gating cardiac blood-pool image MIBI PYP
