期刊文献+

基于投资组合理论的战略指挥能力生成模式比较分析

The Comparative Analysis of the Generation Mode of Strategic Command Capability Based on the Portfolio Theory
原文传递
导出
摘要 恰当选择战略指挥能力生成模式是提升战略指挥能力的前提和基础.在对战略指挥能力生成模式进行理论分析的基础上,运用投资组合理论和网络层次分析法,构建战略指挥能力生成模式的因果关系模型和内部因素效能模型,分析战略指挥能力生成因素的效能影响系数和权重,并对战略指挥能力的四种主要生成模式进行数值仿真和成本比较分析. It is the premise and the basis of the advance of strategic command capability to correctly choose the generation mode of strategic command capability. On the basis of theoretical analysis for the generation mode of strategic command capability, the article constructs the causal relationship model and internal factor effectiveness model of generation mode of strategic command capability, analyzes the effective coefficient and weight of generating factors of strategic command capability by using the Portfolio Theory and the Analytic Network Process, and carries out the number simulation and the comparative analysis of cost on four main generation modes of strategic command capability.
作者 陈敏 刘会民 CHEN Min;LIU Hui-min(Institute of Mathematics and Systems Science of Chinese Academy of Sciences,Beijing 100190,China;University of Chinese Academy of Sciences,Beijing 100190,China)
出处 《数学的实践与认识》 北大核心 2018年第21期149-162,共14页 Mathematics in Practice and Theory
关键词 战略指挥能力 生成模式 比较分析 投资组合理论 网络层次分析法 strategic command capability generation mode comparative analysis portfolio theory analytic network process
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献26

  • 1李维安,戴文涛.公司治理、内部控制、风险管理的关系框架--基于战略管理视角[J].审计与经济研究,2013,28(4):3-12. 被引量:225
  • 2冯用富,王庆仁,苟骏.约束条件下理性与中国股市投资者行为[J].金融研究,2004(9):57-64. 被引量:14
  • 3MARTIN M V. Design for variety: a methodology for develo- ping product platform architectures[D]. Stanford, Cal. , USA: Stanford University, 1999. 被引量:1
  • 4KOTA S, SETHURAMAN K. Managing variety in product families through design for commonality[C]//Proceedings of ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences. Now York, N.Y., USA: ASME, 1998:1-12. 被引量:1
  • 5JIAO Jianxin, TSENG M. Understanding product family for mass customization by developing commonality indices [J]. Journal of Engineering Design, 2000, 11(3): 225-243. 被引量:1
  • 6BLECKER T. The development of a component commonality metric for mass customization[J]. IEEE Transaction on Engi- neering Management, 2007, 54(1): 70-85. 被引量:1
  • 7BATALLAS D A, YASSINE A A. Information leaders in product development organizational networks: social network analysis of the design structure matrix[J]. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 2006, 53(4): 570-582. 被引量:1
  • 8BRADLEY J A, YASSINE ALIA. On the use of network a- nalysis in product development teams [C]//Proceedings of ASME 2006 International Design Engineering Technical Con- ferences and 18th International Conference on Design Theory and Methodology. Now York,N. Y. , USA: ASME, 2006. 被引量:1
  • 9BRAHA D, BAR-YAM Y. Information flow structure in large-scale product development organizational networks[J]. Journal of Information Technology, 2004, 19(4): 244-253. 被引量:1
  • 10BRAHA D, BAR-YAM Y. The statistical mechanics of com- plex product development: empirical an analytical results[J].Management Science, 2007, 53(7): 1127-1145. 被引量:1

共引文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部