期刊文献+

尿流率测定对前列腺增生治疗效果的评价作用 被引量:1

Effect of uroflowmetry in the evaluation of curative effect for benign prostatic hyperplasia
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨尿流率测定对前列腺增生治疗效果的评价作用。方法前列腺增生患者246例,其中89例接受前列腺等离子电切术(手术组),157例接受药物治疗(药物组),测定两组治疗前后最大尿流率(Qmax)、平均尿流率(Qave)、尿流时间。结果与治疗前比较,两组患者治疗后1个月的Qmax、Qave均明显增加(P<0.01),尿流时间明显减少(P<0.01),以手术组更为显著(P<0.01)。结论尿流率测定可作为评价保守治疗与等离子电切术治疗后疗效重要的客观指标。 Objective To explore the effect of uroflowmetry in the evaluation of curative effect for benign prostatic hyperplasia. Methods246 patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia were included in the study, of which 89 patients received prostate plasma resection(Operation Group) and 157 patients received drug therapy(Drug Group). The maximum urine flow rate(Qmax), average urine flow rate(Qave) and urine flow time(T) of the two groups were measured before and after treatment. Compared with those before treatment, the Qmax and Qave in the two groups increased significantly Results1 month after the treatment(P〈0.01) and T decreased in the two groups significantly(P〈0.01) 1 month after the treatment, which the Operation Group showed a more significant change(P〈0.01). Conclusion Uroflowmetry can be used as an objective index to evaluate the efficacy of conservative treatment and plasma resection.
作者 刘雷 黄星华 李逊 陈楚义 李坚伟 陈统权 周建华 LIU Lei;HUANG Xing-hua;LI Xun;CHEN Chu-yi;LI Jian-wei;CHEN Tong-quan;ZHOU Jian-hua(Longgang People's Hospital of Shenzhen,Shenzhen 518172,China;The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University,Guangzhou 510799,China)
出处 《广东医科大学学报》 2018年第4期435-437,共3页 Journal of Guangdong Medical University
关键词 良性前列腺增生 尿流率测定 经尿道前列腺等离子电切术 benign prostatic hyperplasia uroflowmetry transurethral plasmakinetic prostatectomy
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献37

  • 1潘良,唐来坤,郦俊生,杨银才,李立,沙键,田峰,程捷,赵弈文,方超.良性前列腺增生向膀胱突入所成角度评估梗阻程度的意义[J].中国综合临床,2006,22(9):827-829. 被引量:2
  • 2宋涛,高晓军,姜兴金,蔡叶萍,曲虹.经直肠超声评价前列腺突人膀胱致膀胱出口梗阻的研究[J].中华超声影像学杂志,2007,16(8):692-695. 被引量:10
  • 3Botto H,Lebret T, Barre P, et al. Electrovaporization of prostate with the Gyrus Device. J Endourol,2001,15 : 319-322. 被引量:1
  • 4Ramsey EW. Benign prostatic hyperplasia: a review. Can J Urol,2000,7 : 1135-1143. 被引量:1
  • 5Mebust W, Hohgrewe H, Coeket APC, et al. Transurethral prostectomy: immediate and post operative complication. A comparative study of 13 participating institution evaluating 3 885 patients. J Uro1,1989,141:243-247. 被引量:1
  • 6Virdi J, Kapasi F, Chandrasekar P, et al. A prospective randomized study between transurethral vaporization using plasmakinetic energy and transurethral resection of the prostate. J Urol,2000,163 (4 suppl) :268-269. 被引量:1
  • 7Donovan JL, Peters TJ, Neal DE, et al. A randomized trial comparing transurethral resection of the prostate,laser therapy and conservative treatment of men with symptoms associated with benign pro6tatic enlargement : the CLasP study. J Urol,2000 ,164 :65-70. 被引量:1
  • 8邓春华,中华泌尿外科杂志,1997年,18卷,116页 被引量:1
  • 9梅骅,中华泌尿外科杂志,1997年,18卷,131页 被引量:1
  • 10廖利民,中华泌尿外科杂志,1996年,17卷,746页 被引量:1

共引文献441

同被引文献6

引证文献1

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部