摘要
共识度主要描述诉、辩、审三方对司法判决认识的一致性程度,从一个侧面反映了司法审判的公信力水平和法律职业群体的职业化水平,是分析正当防卫刑事审判中＂司法异化现象＂的规模、范围和成因及其对司法公信力影响的有效方法。研究发现,我国防卫权刑事审判中诉辩审三方均保持着高水平的内部共识,但群体间的外部共识水平显明显偏低。轻易认定互殴、互殴基本排除正当防卫、被害人过错成为僵尸情节等＂司法异化＂现象在司法职业群体中拥有高度共识,但为外部群体所高度异议,刑事司法公信力面临巨大挑战。
The consensus degree describes the consistency to the sentence of the court among the prosecutor,the defender and the judge,which reflect the credibility of trials. It is an effective method to analyze the judicial alienation in china justifiable self defense trials. Based on quantitative research,we found that the prosecutor,the defender and the judge keep a high lever inside consensus,and on the contrary an obviously lower outside consensus. In cases of mutual assault,the possibility of justifiable self-defense essentially was ruled out. The victim＇s being at fault did not diminish the criminal responsibility of the defendant. All of these facts turn into huge challenges to judicial credibility.
出处
《政法论坛》
CSSCI
北大核心
2018年第6期13-24,共12页
Tribune of Political Science and Law
基金
中国博士后科学基金(编号2016M602115)、山东省博士后创新项目基金(编号201602016)
山东省社会科学规划项目(编号18CFXJ04)的阶段性成果
关键词
防卫权
刑事审判
共识度
司法公信力
Justifiable Self Defense
Criminal Trials
Consensus Degree
Judicial Credibility
