摘要
只有以"异化劳动"而不是"异化"为核心范畴,从方法论、本体论、认识论三重维度重新阐发《1844年经济学哲学手稿》中的历史哲学,才能科学揭示其在历史唯物主义理论形成进程中的"积极过渡"作用。从资产阶级经济学的理论和现实之间的矛盾出发,马克思对黑格尔辩证法的本质问题进行批判,以"劳动"取代"绝对精神"而赋予了历史辩证法以物质性的内蕴。不能简单地把马克思的思想与西方哲学史上的本体论理论混为一谈,但对于"真正的历史"而言,劳动之于自然界、人自身和社会的生成价值,使得这一关系性范畴在本体论意义上得到了确证。为论证共产主义生成这一历史之谜的答案,马克思提出了许多较为深刻的历史唯物主义原理,认识到经济运动和其他因素的矛盾作用是推动历史由低级向高级发展的动力。
We may scientifically uncover the ＂positive transition＂ effect of the historical philosophy within The Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844 on the development process of historical materialism only if we explicate it form the three dimensions of methodology, ontology and epistemology, taking ＂alienated labor＂, instead of ＂alienation＂, as the core category. From the contradiction between the reality and the bourgeois economics theories, Marx criticized the essential problems in Hegel’s dialectics by replacing the ＂absolute spirit＂ with ＂labor＂, so as to add the material connotation of historical dialectics. Although Marx’s ideas do not equal to the ontology in western philosophy absolutely, the relational category of ＂real history＂ was verified in the aspect of ontology by the forming value of labor to the nature, human beings and society. Marx came up with a series of profound historical materialism principles to clarify the formation of communism, and he realized that the contradiction between economical campaigns and other factories is the motivation of historical development from a lower level to the higher.
作者
李国泉
周向军
Li Guoquan;Zhou Xiangjun
出处
《马克思主义理论学科研究》
CSSCI
2018年第5期63-76,共14页
Studies on Marxist Theory
基金
马克思主义理论研究和建设工程重大项目(2017YZD09)阶段性成果
关键词
异化劳动
历史辩证法
劳动本体论
历史唯物主义
alienated labor
historical dialectics
labor ontology
historical materialism
