期刊文献+

基于场景的AEB误动作分析与优化 被引量:2

Analysis and Optimization of AEB False Positive Based on Scenarios
下载PDF
导出
摘要 AEB自动紧急制动(含FCW前向碰撞报警)功能能够有效减少或缓解碰撞事故的发生,但由于国内交通状况复杂,驾驶员驾驶习惯比较激进、随意,导致国内驾驶员对AEB功能的满意率欠佳,本文通过文献调研、用户意见搜集等方式,采集国内车型现有AEB误动作的典型场景,尤其是关于碰撞报警以及制动干预等方面的功能表现,结合AEB工作机理分析误动作发生的主要原因,基于典型国内交通场景并以C-NCAP星级评价等为开发目标进行优化设计,最后通过Matlab/Simulink和PreScan等仿真工具对优化方案进行了虚拟验证。 AEB(Autonomous Emergency Brake) including FCW(Forward Collision Warning) function can effectively reduce or mitigate traffic accidents. However, the satisfaction rate of AEB function is poor in China because of the complex traffic situation, aggressive and rule-less driving habits. This paper collected typical false positive scenarios of AEB with false or early warning or braking through literature study and VOC (Voice of Custom) collection etc. Based on the theoretical analysis of AEB function, root causes of false positive cases were found, and then optimization was made to reduce the false warning and / or braking while meeting the safety rating goal of C-NCAP, which is greatly helpful for improving the performance of current AEB functions. CAE tools including Maflab/Simulink and PreScan were used to validate the optimization scheme virtually.
作者 黄福俊 HUANG Fu-jun(Tongji University,Shanghai 200000,China)
出处 《汽车科技》 2018年第6期42-49,共8页 Auto Sci-Tech
关键词 机理分析 CAE 优化设计 C-NCAP AEB false positive root-cause analysis CAE optimization design C-NCAP
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献23

  • 1McGehee D, Brown T, Lee J, et el. Effect of warning timing on collision avoidance behavior in a stationary lead vehicle scenario [J]. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2002, 1803: 1. 被引量:1
  • 2Soma H, Hiramatsu K. Driving simulator experiment on drivers' behaviour and effectiveness of danger warning against emergency braking of leading vehicle [C]//Proceedings of the 16th ESV, Canada. Washington D C.. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), 1998. 被引量:1
  • 3Ranney T A. Psychological factors that influence car-following and car-following model development [ J]. Transportation Research, Part F.. Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 1999, 2 (4) : 213. 被引量:1
  • 4Ben-Yaacov A, Maltz M, Shinar D. Effects of an in-vehicle collision avoidance warning system on short- and long-term driving performance [J]. Human Factors.. The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 2002, 44(2).. 335. 被引量:1
  • 5Dingus T A, McGehee D V, Manakkal N, et al. Human factors field evaluation of automotive headway maintenance/collision warning devices [J]. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 1997, 39(2) : 216. 被引量:1
  • 6Ervin R, Sayer J, LeBlanc D, et al. Automotive Collision Avoidance System field operational test report., methodology and results [R]. Washington D C: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), 2005. 被引量:1
  • 7Gurusinghe G, Nakatsuji T, Azuta Y, et al. Multiple car- following data with real-time kinematic global positioning system [J]. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2002, 1802: 166. 被引量:1
  • 8Taylor J, Zhou X, Rouphail N M, et al. Method for investigating intra driver heterogeneity using vehicle trajectory data., a dynamic time warping approach [J]. Transportation Research, Part B: Methodological, 2015, 73: 59. 被引量:1
  • 9Fitch G M, Hanowski R J. Using naturalistic driving research to design, test and evaluate driver assistance systems [M]// Handbook of Intelligent Vehicles. London: Springer, 2012: 559-580. 被引量:1
  • 10Zhang G, Wang Y, Wei H, et al. Examining headway distribution models with urban freeway loop event data [J]. Transportation Research Record.. Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2007, 1999.. 141. 被引量:1

共引文献13

同被引文献24

引证文献2

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部