摘要
本文在陆建德有关珏方现代“内省”诗学的论述基础上．指出在当前中国倡导西方“内省”诗学以及诗歌有利于中国现代诗歌主体的内省，能够丰富中国现代诗歌的内涵，促进中国现代诗歌乃至中国现代文化在“理性”层面的深度拓展。与此同时，本文也认为，我们不必采取“一废一立”的二元对立思维模式，在倡导西方“内省”诗学时排斥中国传统的“自美”诗学。为了阐明其中道理，本文在陆建德所采用的“介入式批评”方法之外，提出了“还原式批评”的方法，指出从文化“认信”逻辑来看，西方诗人是以“负面”的方法来“认信”社会文化规范的。相比之下，中国的“言志”诗人（即陆建德所说的“自美”诗人）则是通过“正面”的方法来“认信”社会文化规范的。中西诗人采取的方法不同，不过其所实现的文化“认信”结果是相同的，并无优劣之分。
Based upon Lu Jiande＇s discussions on modem western poetics, the so-called ＂self-deniar＇ poetics, this essay further points out that it could indeed help develop the reflective quality of the subject of modern Chinese poetry, broaden its scope, and bring into it, even Modern Chinese culture as a whole, much more quality of reason that it wants pretty much. In the meanwhile, this essay disagrees with Lu＇s views that play down traditional Chinese poetry by taking the ＂self-denial＂ poetics as the correct model. In order to make it dear, Lu＇s methodology of criticism is identified as ＂Intrusion Method＂. In contrast, the esay proposes another critical methodology that is called ＂Restoration Method＂. With the new method, we find that western poets claim their cultural faith in the way of ＂self- denial＂, while traditional Chinese poets do it in the way Of ＂self-confirmation＂. Despite the difference of approach, both of them reach the same goal for cultural identity, which is of equal value.
出处
《文学理论前沿》
CSSCI
2017年第2期191-216,共26页
Frontiers of Literary Theory
基金
本人所主持的国家社科项目“‘自由’的法则——英美现代诗歌形式研究”[14BWW052]
广东省哲学社会科学项目“现代英语诗歌‘自由形式’的基础理论问题研究”[GD13CWW05]的部分研究成果
关键词
中国与西方
诗歌
文化
现代
自美
China and the West
poetry
culture
modern
narcissism
