期刊文献+

成就目标问卷中文版的信效度检验及其在大学英语开放式教学中的应用 被引量:5

Application of the Achievement Goal Questionnaire to Open Teaching of College English
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:考察成就目标问卷中文版在中国大学生群体中的信度和效度,并探索成就目标取向对大学英语开放式教学效果及大学生英语课堂学习行为的影响效应。方法:招募某大学188名不同专业的大一学生进入研究,所有被试完成为期1年的大学英语开放式课堂学习。项目完成后,所有被试填写中文版成就目标问卷和大学英语开放式课堂行为表现问卷,追踪所有被试大学英语四级考试成绩作为教学效果评估指标。结果:总量表α系数为0.83,各分量表的Cronbachα系数均不低于0.80,折半信度为0.89,验证性因素分析结果显示数据较好地拟合了成就目标的二阶模型(CFI=0.942, TLI=0.921, RMSEA=0.078,SRMR=0.049)。多元线性回归分析结果表明,掌握—趋近与成绩—趋近目标取向均对课堂表现具有正性预测作用,而掌握—回避与成绩—回避目标取向均对课堂表现具有负性预测作用。同时,二元logistic模型表明成绩—趋近和成绩—回避目标取向对大学生四级英语考试成绩分别具有正性与负性的显著影响。结论:中文版成就目标问卷具有良好的信效度;同时,成就目标取向对大学生英语学习行为和英语成绩具有显著影响。 Objective: This paper is to examine the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of Achievement Goal Questionnaire in Chinese college students and to explore the influence of students' achievement goals on the effectiveness of opening teaching model of College English and students' behavior. Methods: After one-year study of College English, a sample of 188 college freshmen majoring in different subjects completed Achievement Goal Questionnaire and learning be- havior questionnaire for open teaching of College English. Meanwhile, their scores in CET 4 were treated as an index of teaching and learning effectiveness. Results: The Cronbach' s alpha coefficient was 0.83 and the Cronbach' s alpha coeffi- cients of all the subscales were not less than 0.80. The split-half reliability was 0.89. The result of confirmatory factor analy- sis indicated that the data fitted the second order model of achievement goals(CFI=0.942, TLI=0.921, RMSEA=0.078, SRMR=0.049). Multiple linear regression analysis indicated that both mastery-approach and performance-approach goals could positively predict students' performance in English class, which would be negatively predicted by mastery-avoidance and performance-avoidance goals. Besides, binary logistic regression showed that performance-approach goal and perfor- mance-avoidance goal would respectively predict students' good and bad performance in CET 4. Conclusion: The Chi- nese version of Achievement Goal Questionnaire is a reliable and valid means of assessing Chinese college students' achievement goal orientation. In addition, different types of achievement goals have a significant impact on students' perfor- mance and achievements of College English study.
作者 刘茜 李清平 刘卓澜 LIU Qian;LI Qing-ping;LIU Zhuo-lan(School of Foreign Languages,Central South University,Changsha 410083,China;School of Mathematics and Statistics,Central South University,Changsha 410083,China)
出处 《中国临床心理学杂志》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2018年第5期922-926,共5页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology
基金 国家社会科学基金项目(15BYY053) 湖南省哲学社会科学基金项目(15YBB070) 湖南省哲学社会科学基金外语科研联合项目(17WLH44)
关键词 成就目标问卷 大学英语 开放式教学 信度 效度 Achievement Goal Questionnaire College English Open Teaching Reliability Validity
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献13

  • 1王海莹."怎样培养学生的问题意识",《中国教育报》2014年2月28日. 被引量:3
  • 2Abeysekera L. & P. Dawson. Motivation and cognitive load in the flipped classroom : Definition, rationale and a call for research [J]. Higher Education Research & Development, 2014(34): 1-14. Doi: 10.1080/07294360.2014. 934336. 被引量:1
  • 3Anderson, L., D. Krathwohl, P. Airasian, K. Cruikshank, R. Mayer, E Pintrich, J. Rahts, M. Wittrock. A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing - A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives [M]. New York: Longman, 2001. 被引量:1
  • 4Bishop, J. & M. Verleger. The flipped classroom: A survey of the research[R]. Paper presented at the 120th ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Atlanta, GA,2013. 被引量:1
  • 5Bransford, D., L. Brown, & R. Cocking. How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience and School [M]. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1999. 被引量:1
  • 6Hwang, J., L. Lai & Y. Wang. Seamless flipped learning: A mobile technology-enhanced flipped classroom with effective learning strategies [J]. J. Comput Educ, 2015(2)4:449-473. (Springer, doi: 10.1007/s40692-015-0043-0). 被引量:1
  • 7Jonassen, H. Computers in the Classroom: Mindtools for Critical Thinking [M]. Cloumbus OH:Merrill/Prentice-Hall, 1996. 被引量:1
  • 8Jonassen, H., C. Carr & P. as Mindtools for engaging Yueh. Computers learners in critical thinking [J]. TechTrends, 1998(43)2:24-32. 被引量:1
  • 9Kim, K., M. Kim, O. Khera & J. Getman. The experience of three flipped classrooms in an urban university: An exploration of design principles, lnternet and Higher Education, 2014(22):37-50. 被引量:1
  • 10Mayer, E. & C. Wittrock. Problem-solving transfer [A]. In D. Berliner & R. Calfee (eds). Handbook of Educational Psychology [C]. New York: Macmillan,1996. 被引量:1

共引文献109

同被引文献47

引证文献5

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部