摘要
目的探讨氧驱动雾化吸入与空气压缩泵雾化吸入治疗小儿哮喘的临效果。方法回顾分析我院2015年9月至2017年8月收治的88例小儿哮喘患儿作为观察对象,按照随机数字表法分为治疗组和对照组,各组均为44例,对照组在常规治疗基础上应用空气压缩泵雾化吸入治疗,治疗组在常规治疗基础上应用氧驱动雾化吸入治疗,观察并比较2组临床治疗效果的差异。结果治疗组的治疗总有效率为97.7%,显著高于对照组84.1%,两组比较差异存在统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论小儿哮喘患者接受氧驱动雾化吸入与空气压缩泵雾化吸入治疗对均具有很好的治疗效果,但前者效果更为确切,值得临床广泛应用。
Objective to explore clinical effect of oxygen driven atomization inhalation and air compression pump atomization inhalation in treatment of asthma children. Methods review and analyze 88 cases asthma children in our hospital from September 2015 to August 2017 as study objects, divide them into treatment and control group according to random digital table method, 4 cases in each. Control group was treated with air compression pump inhalation on the basis of routine treatment, and treatment group with oxygen driven atomization inhalation based on routine treatment. Observe and compare clinical effect difference between two groups. Results total effective rate of treatment group was 97.7%, significantly higher than control group（84.1%）, difference between two groups was statistically significant（P〈0.05）. Conclusion both oxygen driven atomization inhalation and air compression pump atomization inhalation has good curative effect for asthma children, but the former has more accurate effect and is worthy of wide clinical application.
作者
白仲梅
BAI Zhong-mei(Xixiang County People＇s Hospital,Hanzhoung,Shaanxi,72350)
出处
《智慧健康》
2018年第21期117-118,共2页
Smart Healthcare
关键词
小儿哮喘
氧驱动雾化吸入
空气压缩泵雾化吸入
Children asthma
Oxygen driven atomization inhalation
Air compression pump atomization inhalation
