摘要
刑法理论关于构成要件与刑罚法规之间关系的学说有罪状论和解释论。罪状论在逻辑上更连贯,在构成要件适用中不易混淆事实认定,有利于树立构成要件在刑法解释之前的地位,充分发挥构成要件的罪刑法定机能、对犯罪类型的制约功能,促进形成"形式入罪、实质出罪"的刑法适用理念。多数罪状内容描述的犯罪行为是作为,排斥不作为构成要件,可以限缩不真正不作为犯;罪状具有抽象性,可以为构成要件涵摄过程划定抽象程度标准,破除认识错误论中的具体符合说;罪状还具有事实性与规范性,可以区分"构成要件满足性"与"构成要件该当性",在构成要件阶段解决疑难问题。
The theory of criminal law theories about the relationship between the elements constituting the regulations and penalties have guilt theory and interpretation theory. The theory of guilt is logically more coherent. It is not easy to confuse fact determination in the application of constitutive elements. It is conducive to establish the constitutional elements before the interpretation of criminal law. It fully exploits the constitutive elements of the functions of crimes and the functions of confinement of crimes and promotes the formation of ＂forms＂. The criminal law applicable concept of incrimination and substantial crime. The criminal acts described by most of the crimes are acts, exclusion is not a constitutive element, and can be reduced to no real innocence; the guilt is abstract, and can abstract the level of abstraction for the process of composing the elements, and eliminate the specifics in the theory of misunderstanding. According to the statement of conformity, the guilt is also factual and normative. It can distinguish between ＂constitutional elements satisfaction＂ and ＂constitutional elements＂ and solve difficult problems at the stage of composing elements.
作者
蔡燊
CAI Shen(Law School,Southeast University,Nanjing Jiangsu 211189,China)
出处
《成都理工大学学报（社会科学版）》
2018年第5期1-11,共11页
Journal of Chengdu University of Technology:Social Sciences
基金
教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目"刑法出罪机制问题研究"的阶段性成果(15YJA820015)
关键词
构成要件
刑罚法规
罪状论
解释论
constitutive elements
penalty regulations
criminal theory
interpretation
