摘要
《中国入世议定书》15条中的期限条款逾期已两年,无论效力期限内还是效力期限外,欧美等国一贯的采用"替代国"价格,纵使提起反倾销审查的理由从"非市场经济地位"转变到"市场扭曲",其本质是一样的。退出WTO的问题被学者、新闻工作者广泛讨论。经过分析,退出WTO终究是弊大于利的,我们应当在保持WTO成员国身份的同时据理力争依据WTO规则的合法利益,不能草率的谈"退世"。"退世"的呼吁是不成熟,是弊大于利的。
The term clause in Article 15 of the Protocol on the accession of the PRC has been overdue for two years. Whetherwithin or outside the validity period, European countries and the United States consistently use ＂ surrogate country＂ price. Even ifthe reason for anti￣dumping review has changed from ＂ non￣market economy status＂ to ＂market distortion＂ , the essence is the same.The issue of exiting WTO is widely discussed by scholars and journalists. Analysis found that it will do more harm than good to with￣draw from WTO. Therefore, we should strive for the legitimate interests in accordance with WTO rules while maintaining WTO mem￣bership. The call to ＂ exit WTO＂ is premature and does more harm than good.
作者
梁仁辉
LIANG Ren-hui(Law School,Hunan Normal University,Changsha 410081,China)
出处
《湖南人文科技学院学报》
2018年第4期19-23,共5页
Journal of Hunan University of Humanities,Science and Technology
关键词
中国入世议定书
第15条
“替代国”价格
退出WTO
Protocol on the accession of the PRC
Article 15
＂ Surrogate country＂ price
exiting WTO
