期刊文献+

改良良TESSYS技术治疗腰椎管狭窄症的临床研究

Modified TESSYS Technology in Treatment of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:探讨改良TESSYS技术治疗腰椎管狭窄症的方法与疗效。方法:选取应用改良TESSYS技术治疗的50例腰椎管狭窄症患者的完整随访资料,比较术前、术后1周、术后1月、术后3月VAS及Oswestry评分的变化情况。结果:50例患者术后1周、术后1月、术后3月VAS及Oswestry评分均较术前显著降低,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。结论:改良TESSYS技术治疗腰椎管狭窄症是一种安全、有效的微创术式,可在临床中进行推广应用。 Objective: To investigate the methods and efficacy of modified TESSYS technology for lumbar spinal stenosis. Methods: Complete follow-up data from 50 cases of patients with lumbar spinal stenosis who were treated with modified TESSYS technology were selected to compare the changes of VAS and Oswestry scores at the time of before operation and 1 week, 1 month and 3 months after operation. Results: 1 week, 1 month and 3 months after operation, the VAS and Oswestry scores of 50 cases were significantly decreased, which had statistical difference(P〈0.01). Conclusion: Modified TESSYS technology is a kind of safe and effective minimally invasive surgical treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis, which can be promoted and applied in clinical practice.
作者 李志峰 闫虎 LI Zhi-feng;YAN Hu(Taian TCM Hospital,Taian,Shandong 271000)
机构地区 泰安市中医医院
出处 《按摩与康复医学》 2018年第19期45-48,共4页 Chinese Manipulation and Rehabilitation Medicine
关键词 腰椎管狭窄症 改良TESSYS技术 椎间孔镜 微创 lumbar spinal stenosis modified TESSYS technology endoscopic transforaminal discectomy minimally invasive
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献28

  • 1于天泉,王义,刘昱,张进学,张德桂.侧隐窝狭窄的边界值[J].骨与关节损伤杂志,1993,8(1):7-9. 被引量:28
  • 2Genevay S, Atlas SI, Kate JN. Variation in eligibility criteria from studies of radiculopathy due to a herniated disc and of neurogenic claudication due to lumbar spinal stenosis: a structured literature review. Spine(Phila Pa 1976), 2010, 35 (7) :803-811. 被引量:1
  • 3Malmivaara A, Naris P, Heliovaara M, et al. S Surgical or nonoperative treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis? A randomized controlled trial. Spine(Phila Pa 1976), 2007, 32(1):1-8. 被引量:1
  • 4Whitman JM, Flynn TW, Childs JD, et al. A comparison between two physical therapy treatment programs for patientswith lumbar spinal stenosis: a randorr&,ed dinieal trial. Spine(Phila Pa 1976), 2006, 31(22):2541-2549. 被引量:1
  • 5Cavusoglu H, Kaya RA, Turkrnoglu ON, et al. IVdterm outcome after unilateral approach for bilateral decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis: year prospective study. Eur Spine J, 2307, 16(12) :2133-2142. 被引量:1
  • 6Tafazal SI, Ng L, Sell P. Randomised placel:controned trial on the effectiveness of nasal salmon calcitonin in the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosi Eur Spine J, 2007, i6(2):207-212. 被引量:1
  • 7Weinstein JN, Tosteson TD, Lurie JD, et al. Surgical versus nonsurgical therapy for lumbar spinal stenosisis N Engl J Med, 2008, 358(8) :794-810. 被引量:1
  • 8HuskSssen-EC.-Me'asm-:ment'ofpain [ J]." Lancei,-1974, 2(7889): 1127-1131. 被引量:1
  • 9Chow JH, Chan CC. Validation of the Chinese version of the Oswestry Disability Index[J]. Work, 2035, 25.(4) :307-314. 被引量:1
  • 10Macnab I. Negative disc exploration. An analysis of the causes of nerve-root involvement in sixty-eight patients [ J ]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1971, 53(5) :891-903. 被引量:1

共引文献46

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部