摘要
目的了解上海市青浦区农民和非农民吸烟者的吸烟合理化信念的持有情况和差别,为进一步开展控烟干预提供理论依据。方法采用横断面调查方法,选择该区15岁以上农民和非农民的男性吸烟者,调查其吸烟情况、吸烟合理化信念情况和基本情况,并进行描述性统计分析,比较两类吸烟者之间吸烟合理化信念的持有情况。结果两类吸烟者的安全吸烟论、自我赦免论和戒烟有害论的持有率差别具有统计学意义(P<0.05),且农民吸烟者的此类信念持有率高于非农民吸烟者。两类吸烟者自我赦免论、社会接受论、戒烟有害论和安全吸烟论的均分差别有统计学意义(P<0.05),农民吸烟者的均分高于非农民吸烟者。结论吸烟合理化信念在青浦区的吸烟者中普遍存在。农民吸烟者与非农民吸烟者之间的吸烟合理化信念存在差别;农民吸烟者吸烟合理化信念较非农民吸烟者严重。制定控烟干预策略或措施时,需要考虑到吸烟合理信念的存在。
Objective To know ownership and difference of the smoking rationalizations between the farmer smokes and non-farmer smokers, for provide theoretical basis for further tobacco control intervention. Methods Using Cross-sectional study, the smokers above 15 years old whose job was the farmer or not farmers were selected. Their smoking status, smoking rationalizations, and basic situations were investigated. Then some descriptive statistics analysis was carried out to compare smoking rationalizations of the two kinds of smokers. Results There were statistical significances on the ownership differences of the safety harm reduction belief; skeptic and bullet proof belief, and quit smoking harmful belief between the two kinds of smokers（P〈0.05）. There were statistical significances on the mean differences of the safety harm reduction belief, social environment belief, skeptic and bullet proof belief, and quit smoking harmful belief between the two kinds of smokers（P〈0.05）. Conclusion Smoking rationalizations are prevalent among smokers in Qingpu District, and the farmer smoker’s smoking rationalizations is more serial than the non-farmer smokers. The influence of the smoking rationalizations should been considered when making the tobacco control intervention.
作者
卢灿广
郑频频
田建国
郁晞
刘晓晓
Lu Canguang;Zheng Pingping;Tian Jianguo;Yu Xi;Liu Xiaoxiao(Qingpu District Center for Disease Control and Prevention,Shanghai,201799,China;School of Public Health,Fudan University,Shanghai,200032,China)
出处
《健康教育与健康促进》
2017年第6期545-548,共4页
Health Education and Health Promotion
关键词
农民
非农民
吸烟者
吸烟合理化信念
Farmers
Non-Farmers
Smokers
Smoking rational beliefs
