期刊文献+

运用四点法测量肘关节关节角度的效果探讨 被引量:2

The value of measuring the elbow joint rang of motion with four-point method
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨四点法测量肘关节关节活动度的信度和效度。方法选取健康志愿者30名,拍摄其肘关节主动最大屈曲位X射线片,由物理治疗师在其电子版X射线片上测量关节角度,并采用四点法测量其关节主动最大屈曲角度,然后对比分析。结果四点法与X射线法测量肘关节最大屈曲角度结果的相关系数为0.972,P<0.01。结论四点法测量是一种可靠的方法,可以在康复评定中推广应用。 Objective This article studied the validity and reliability of the four-point method which measure the elbow joint range of motion. Methods Thirty volunteers were studied. Take the X-ray irradiation in the active most flexion position of elbow joint. A physiotherapist measured the elbow joint angle on the E-X-ray photograph and the elbow joint angle of most flexion position with the our-point method in the same day,and then did a comparative analysis. Results The four-point method measurement of the most flexion elbow joint of the correlation coefficient(r =0.972,P 0.01). Conclusion The result of the four-point method is a reliable method, so it is worth popularization and application.
作者 王瑞 李圣节 李飞 王峰 肖红雨 贾子善 Wang Rui;Li Shengjie;Li Fei(Rehabilitation Medicine Center,Chinese PLA General Hospital,Beijing 100853,China)
出处 《中华保健医学杂志》 2018年第4期298-299,共2页 Chinese Journal of Health Care and Medicine
基金 解放军总医院临床科研扶持基金(2015FC-TSYS-1032)
关键词 关节角度 三点法 四点法 Joint angle Three-point method Four-point method
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献28

  • 1Moriguchi CS,Carnaz L,Silva LC,et al.Reliability of intra-and inter-rater palpation discrepancy and estimation of its effects on joint angle measurements.Man Ther,2009,14:299-305. 被引量:1
  • 2Enwemeka CS.Radiographic verification of knee goniometry.Scand J Rehabil Med,1986,18:47-49. 被引量:1
  • 3Edwards JZ,Greene KA,Davis RS,et al.Measuring flexion in knee arthroplasty patients.J Arthroplasty,2004,19:369-372. 被引量:1
  • 4Piriyaprasarth P,Morris ME,Winter A,et al.The reliability of knee joint position testing using electrogoniometry.BMC Musculoskelet Disord,2008,9:6. 被引量:1
  • 5Liao JJ.Sample size calculation for an agreement study.Pharm Stat,2010,9:125-132. 被引量:1
  • 6Hanneman SK.Design,analysis,and interpretation of method-comparison studies.AACN Adv Criti Care,2009,19:223-234. 被引量:1
  • 7Bland JM,Altman DG.Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.Lancet,1986,8:307-310. 被引量:1
  • 8Bland JM,Altman DG.Comparing methods of measurement:why plot-ting difference against standard method is misleading.Lancet,1995,346:1085-1087. 被引量:1
  • 9Bland JM,Altman DG.Measuring agreement in method comparison studies.Stat Methods Med Res,1999,8:135-160. 被引量:1
  • 10Dewitte K,Fierens C,Stockl D,et al.Application of the Bland-Altman plot for interpretation of method-comparison studies:a critical investigation of its practice.Clin Chem,2002,48:799-801. 被引量:1

共引文献6

同被引文献9

引证文献2

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部