摘要
运用意思自治原则选法以实现法律适用的灵活性、追求判决结果的公正是司法实践中遵循的基本理念,然而该原则适用范围的扩张和限制是相伴而生的。欧美注重运用强制性规则为当事人意思自治设定边界,但欧美的经验不适合中国国情。我国已有的立法和司法解释中有关强制性规则的规定还缺乏在相应部门法中明确细化其适用范围的立法配置。中国不应盲目跟从外国适用第三国强制性规则的实践路径,而应秉承互惠的原则,等待合适时机增加适用第三国强制性规范的立法。
It is the fundamental philosophy in practice to apply party autonomy principle in order to realize flexibility and impartiality of law application. However,the expansion and limitation of party autonomy principle go together. Europe and the United States by using the mandatory rules for setting boundaries for it,but the experience of Euramerican is not suitable for Chinese domestic conditions. In our existing legislation and judicial interpretation of the provisions of the relevant mandatory rules,we lack the corresponding department to clarify and refine its configuration. China should not blindly follow the foreign practical path of third countries ＇mandatory rules,but should uphold the principle of mutual benefit,waiting for the right time to increase the legislation of applicable third country＇s mandatory norms.
出处
《法学杂志》
CSSCI
北大核心
2018年第8期126-133,共8页
Law Science Magazine
基金
国家社科基金项目"海洋法公约与中国海洋争端解决政策的选择研究"(项目编号:13BGJ043)
教育部人文社科项目"海洋争端解决机制与中国海洋争端解决政策的选择"(项目编号:10YJA820093)的阶段性成果
关键词
意思自治原则
强制性规则
司法路径
party autonomy principle
mandatory rules
practical path
