期刊文献+

一种新决策模型——量子决策模型 被引量:7

Quantum models for decision making
下载PDF
导出
摘要 近10年以来,一些学者基于量子理论研究思想与方法探索出了量子决策模型。由于该模型独特的理论结构,它可被用于解释传统决策理论所难以解释的问题,尤其是个体在不确定情况下的决策行为。该模型解释了诸如分离效应、分类决策的干涉效应以及合取谬误等传统决策模型很难解释的问题,研究者已经证实其中一种称为量子问题等式的决策模型可以精确地预测决策中的顺序效应。作为一个有助于分析心理学中决策现象的新研究领域,量子决策模型具有深入研究的理论意义和实践意义。 During the recent decade, quantum decision-making models were established based on the mathematical structure and methodologies of quantum mechanics. Owing to its unique theoretical structure, the quantum decision-making models can be applied to explain problems that violate the classical decision models, especially for judgments under uncertainty and decisions under conflicts. Quantum decision-making models have been used to explain phenomena such as disjunction effect, conjunction fallacy and interference of categorization on decision making which are difficult to account for with classical decision models. A model called quantum question equality has been tested for its accurate prediction of order effects. Being a new research field contributing to analysis of decision making, quantum decision-making models worth further investigations both in theoretical and applicative levels.
作者 辛潇洋 徐晨虹 陈宏玉 李瑛 XIN Xiaoyang;XU Chenhong;CHEN Hongyu;LI Ying(School of psychology,Shaanxi Normal University & Key Laboratory of behavioral andcognitive neuroscience of Shaanxi Province,Xi’an 710062,China)
出处 《心理科学进展》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2018年第8期1365-1373,共9页 Advances in Psychological Science
基金 国家社会科学基金教育学青年课题(CCA110105) 陕西师范大学教师教育研究专项(JSJY2017006)
关键词 量子 决策 模型 概率 quantum decision making model probability
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1顾樵著..量子力学 1[M].北京:科学出版社,2014:318.
  • 2李红,谢松法编..复变函数与积分变换 第4版 学习辅导与习题全解[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2013:331.
  • 3刘程浩,徐富明,王伟,李燕,史燕伟.概率判断中的合取谬误[J].心理科学进展,2015,23(6):967-978. 被引量:4
  • 4罗俊明主编..概率论与数理统计[M].郑州:郑州大学出版社,2002:311.
  • 5史荣昌,魏丰编著..矩阵分析[M].北京:北京理工大学出版社,2010:277.
  • 6苏汝铿编著..量子力学[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2002:512.
  • 7孙炯,王万义,赫建文编著..泛函分析[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2010:263.
  • 8汪祚军,李纾.行为决策中出现的分离效应[J].心理科学进展,2008,16(4):513-517. 被引量:8
  • 9曾谨言著..量子力学教程 第3版[M].北京:科学出版社,2014:267.

二级参考文献67

  • 1刘立秋,陆勇.Linda问题:“齐当别”抉择模型的解释[J].心理科学进展,2007,15(5):735-742. 被引量:7
  • 2Savage L J. The Foundations of Statistics. New York: Wiley, 1954 被引量:1
  • 3Tversky A, Shafir E. The disjunction effect in choice under uncertainty. Psychological Science, 1992, 3:305-309 被引量:1
  • 4Shafir E, Tversky A. Thinking through uncertainty: Nonconsequential reasoning and choice. Cognitive Psychology, 1992, 24:449-474 被引量:1
  • 5Lambdin C, Burdsal C. The disjunction effect reexamined: Relevant methodological issues and the fallacy of unspecified percentage comparisons. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes.2007, 103:268-276 被引量:1
  • 6Dawes R M. Everyday irrationality: How pseudo-scientists, lunatics and the rest of us systematically fail to think rationally. Boulder, CO, US: Westview Press, 2001 被引量:1
  • 7van Dijk E, Zeelenberg M. When curiosity killed regret: Avoiding or seeking unknown in decision-making under uncertainty. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2007, 16:656-662 被引量:1
  • 8Li S, Taplin J E. Examining whether there is a disjunction effect in Prisoner's Dilemma Games. Chinese Journal of Psychology, 2002, 44(1): 25-46 被引量:1
  • 9Ellsberg D. Risk, ambiguity, and the Savage axioms. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1961, 75:643-699 被引量:1
  • 10van Dijk E, Zeelenberg M. The disjunction of ambiguous information in economic decision making. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 2003, 16:341-352 被引量:1

共引文献10

同被引文献67

引证文献7

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部