摘要
近年来,我国反垄断民事诉讼案件数量不断增加,但均为个别诉讼案件。个别诉讼不能有效弥补分散的众多受害者的利益损失。集体诉讼制度兼具维护公共利益及大量、小额的私人利益的功能,并且与反垄断法的宗旨相契合。完善我国反垄断民事诉讼制度体系,需要在《反垄断法》中规定集体诉讼制度,包括原告资格认定、诉前通知、明示退出、律师的激励与约束、和解等具体程序和制度;在集体诉讼制度尚未建立的条件下,可以以共同诉讼制度和公益诉讼制度来适当替代集体诉讼制度的功能。
In recent years,the number of anti-monopoly civil lawsuits in China has gradually increased,but most of them are individual lawsuits. Individual lawsuit cannot effectively compensate for the losses of the interests of the numerous and scattered victims.The system of class action has functions of safeguarding public interests and a mass of underrate private interests,which is compatible with the purposes of the anti-monopoly law. In order to improve China’s anti-monopoly civil litigation system,China should introduce class action in the civil litigation system,including the plaintiff qualification,effective notice before litigation,explicit withdrawal,lawyer’s incentive and restraint management,collective representation and other mechanisms. Under the condition that the class action system has not been established,the joint litigation system and the public interest litigation system can be used to appropriately replace the function of the class action system.
作者
冯博
杨童
Feng Bo;Yang Tong
出处
《中州学刊》
CSSCI
北大核心
2018年第6期58-61,共4页
Academic Journal of Zhongzhou
基金
国家社会科学基金青年项目"集体诉讼的功能定位及在反垄断法领域的应用研究"(15CFX047)
关键词
反垄断
集体诉讼
民事诉讼
anti-monopoly
class action
civil litigation
