摘要
为了探讨实施叙事与结构式团体心理咨询对老年性白内障住院患者术前焦虑的差异。将143名被试随机分为三组,入院时进行状态焦虑(STAI,FormY-Ⅰ,S-AI)评估,在手术前1天三组均予常规治疗,此外两试验组分别予叙事和结构式团体心理咨询,再次采用S-AI对三组患者进行测评。结果显示三组在施测完成后,两试验组组内S-AI评分显著低于干预前(P<0.01);对照组组内S-AI评分低于干预前(P<0.05);经多重比较,两试验组之间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。二者的干预效果在定量研究上未见明显差异。对试验组被试的访谈结果进行定性分析,两种干预方式效果有差异。因此,结构式团体心理咨询与叙事团体心理咨询均能显著缓解老年性白内障患者术前状态焦虑。
To investigate the difference effects of structured group counseling and group narrative counseling on preoperative anxiety in age-related cataracts.143 hospitalized age-related cataracts were divided into three groups randomly.The state anxiety inventory（S-AI）was used to evaluate the anxiety level of participants,and at the day before operation,the 3 groups were given routine treatment.Besides,the two experimental groups were given group narrative counseling and structured group counseling.The state anxiety inventory（S-AI）was used to evaluate the anxiety level of participants again.The intragroup S-AI score of the two experimental groups after intervention was significantly lower than that before intervention（P〈0.01）;the intragroup S-AI score of the control group after intervention was lower than that before intervention（P〈0.05）;after multiple comparisons,there is no significant difference between the two experimental groups（P〈0.05）.There is no significant difference in the effect of intervention between them in quantitative research.Qualitative analysis was conducted on the interview results of the subjects in the experimental group,and the effects of the two intervention methods were different.Therefore,compared with the comparison group,both structured group counseling and group narrative counseling can relieve the preoperative anxiety in age-related cataracts effectively.
作者
张玥
韩璞
金灿灿
雷秀雅
ZHANG Yue;HAN Pu;JIN Can-can(Department of Psychology,School of Humanities and Social Sciences,Beijing Forestry University,Beijing 100083,China)
出处
《医学与哲学（B）》
2018年第6期67-70,共4页
Medicine & Philosophy(B)
基金
2016年中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目(2016ZCQ11)
