期刊文献+

会阴结合直肠超声与直肠多层螺旋CT对结直肠癌诊断差异的对比研究 被引量:3

Comparative Study on the Diagnosis of Colorectal Carcinoma with TRUS and with MSCT
原文传递
导出
摘要 为评估会阴结合直肠超声(TRUS)造影检查与直肠多层螺旋CT(MSCT)对结直肠癌诊断准确度的差异,选择2016年4月至2018年3月我院收治的86例结直肠癌患者为本次研究对象,采用随机抽样的方法将患者分为对照组和观察组,每组各43例。其中,对照组采用直肠多层螺旋CT检查,观察组采用会阴结合直肠超声造影检查。分别对2组患者的肿瘤直径、肿瘤侵犯深度、淋巴结转移个数和淋巴结直径水平进行检查和评估。结果显示,观察组患者肿瘤直径达到(4.6±1.2)cm,而对照组为(4.2±1.3)cm,组间比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组淋巴结直径为(8.8±1.1)mm,而对照组为(8.4±1.3)mm,观察组明显优于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结果表明,会阴结合直肠超声造影检查结直肠癌的准确度高于直肠多层螺旋CT的准确度,并且对结直肠癌患者手术方案的制定具有重要的指导意义。 This study was to evaluate and compared the distinction in diagnosing colorectal carcinoma with TRUS(transrectal ultrasound) and with MSCT(muhi-slice CT),enrolled 86 cases who admitted and re- ceived therapy in authors hospital(2016-04 to 2018-03) and randomly divided them into control group and observation one(43 cases for each),which the former's patients received MSCT inspection,the latter re- ceived TRUS, then inspected and evaluated both group's following issues such as neoplasm's diameter,inva- sive depth of tumor,the number of malignated lymph nodes and lymph node's diameter level.As results,in neoplasm's diameter there was statistical difference between the latter and the former[(4.6 ± 1.2) cm vs (4.2±1.3) cm, P 〈0.05] ;in lymph node's diameter there was also statistical difference[(8.8± 1.1) mm vs (8.4±1.3) mm, P 〈0.05].Resuhs show that TRUS has higher accuracy than MSCT in colorectal carcino- ma inspection, thus has important directive significance for developing operative schemes for colorectal car- cinoma.
作者 陈道芒 CHEN Dao-mang(Ultrasound Dept.,the First Affiliated Hospital to Nanyang High Medical School,Nanyang,Henan 47300)
出处 《中国肛肠病杂志》 2018年第6期7-9,共3页 Chinese Journal of Coloproctology
关键词 结直肠肿瘤 直肠超声造影 多层螺旋CT 对比研究 Colorectal tumor TRUS MSCT Comparative study
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献23

  • 1Zhao-Xia Jiang,Sheng-Jian Zhang,Wei-Jun Peng,Bao-Hua Yu.Rectal gastrointestinal stromal tumors:Imaging features with clinical and pathological correlation[J].World Journal of Gastroenterology,2013,19(20):3108-3116. 被引量:31
  • 2张翀宇,芮文斌,吴瑜璇,刘定益,张晓燕,乙芳,祝宇,周文龙,金晓龙,李晔.经直肠超声引导下经会阴前列腺穿刺315例分析[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,2005,26(10):703-705. 被引量:7
  • 3Walsh P C.Complication rates and risk factors of 5 802 transrectal ultrasound-guided sextant biopsies of the prostate within a population-based screening program[J].J Urol,2003,170:314. 被引量:1
  • 4Vis A N,Boerma M O,Ciatto S,et al.Detection of prostate cancer:a comparative study of the diagnostic efficacy of sextant transrectal versus sextant transperineal biopsy[J].Urology,2000,56:617-621. 被引量:1
  • 5Pinkstaff D M,Igel T C,Petrou S P,et al.Systematic transperineal ultrasound-guided template biopsy of the prostate:three-year experience[J].Urology,2005,65:735-739. 被引量:1
  • 6Eskew L A,Bare R L,McCullough D L.Systematic 5 region prostate biopsy is superior to sextant method for diagnosing carcinoma of the prostate[J].J Urol,1997,157:199-202; discussion 202-203. 被引量:1
  • 7Halpern E J,Verkh L,Forsberg F,et al.Initial experience with contrast-enhanced sonography of the prostate[J].AJR Am J Roentgenol,2000,174:1575-1580. 被引量:1
  • 8Ismail M,Gomella I G.Ultrasound for prostate imaging and biopsy[J].Curr Opin Urol,2001,11:471-477. 被引量:1
  • 9Ragde H,Kenny G M,Murphy G P,et al.Transrectal ultrasound microbubble contrast angiography of the prostate[J].Prostate,1997,32:279-283. 被引量:1
  • 10Pelzer A,Bektic J,Berger A P,et al.Prostate cancer detection in men with prostate specific antigen 4 to 10 ng/ml using a combined approach of contrast enhanced color Doppler targeted and systematic biopsy[J].J Urol,2005,173:1926-1929. 被引量:1

共引文献156

同被引文献26

引证文献3

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部