期刊文献+

中国和韩国高考数学试题综合难度比较研究 被引量:51

Comparative Study on the Comprehensive Difficulty of Mathematics Questions of College Entrance Examination in Chinese and Korean
下载PDF
导出
摘要 中国和韩国同属儒家文化圈,在高考制度上有着共同的特点,具有相互借鉴的价值.依据高考数学试题的特点,将传统的综合难度系数模型做了改进,再利用改进后的综合难度系数模型,对中韩两国近3年的高考数学试题从"背景因素、是否含参、运算水平、推理能力、知识含量、思维方向、知识水平"7个因素进行分析,比较得出"中韩数学试题‘背景因素’有明显差异,韩国试题更加注重问题情境;韩国试题‘推理因素’难度水平偏低,注重演绎推理与合情推理的结合;中国高考数学试题‘综合难度’偏高,要求考生有一定的数学基础"的结论,为中国高考数学试题的命制提供参考. China and South Korea were the typical countries in the Confucian culture circle, with the common characteristics of the college entrance examination system and the value of mutual reference. According to the characteristics of the college entrance examination questions, the traditional comprehensive difficulty coefficient model had been improved and used to analyze the mathematics questions of college entrance examination in China and Korean for nearly three years. The analysis was based on seven dimensions, including background factors, whether it contained ginseng, operation level, reasoning ability, knowledge content, direction of thinking and knowledge level. Conclusions could be made as follows: The background factors of Chinese and Korean math questions were significantly different; South Korea test questions paid more attention to problem situations; The difficulty level of reasoning factors in South Korea test questions was low, and more attentions were paid to the combination of deductive reasoning and rational reasoning combination; The comprehensive difficulty of Chinese college entrance examination mathematics test was on the high side, and certain mathematics foundations were requited for the examines. These conclusions may provide references for setting questions of the test in China.
作者 武小鹏 张怡 WU Xiao-peng;ZHANG Yi(College of Teacher Education, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China;Qiannan Normal University for Nationalities, School of Mathematics and Statistics, Guizhou Qiannan 558000, China)
出处 《数学教育学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2018年第3期19-24,29,共7页 Journal of Mathematics Education
基金 2016年贵州省教育科学规划青年课题——基于FIAS的课堂教学语言综合量化评价研究(2016C048)
关键词 综合难度系数 比较研究 高考试题 韩国高考 comprehensive difficulty coefficient comparative study college entrance examination questions Korean collegeentrance examination
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

二级参考文献98

共引文献596

同被引文献211

引证文献51

二级引证文献128

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部