期刊文献+

外周血生物标志物在前列腺癌鉴别诊断中的作用及对恶性程度评判价值 被引量:14

The Application of Peripheral Blood Biomarkers in the Differential Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer and Its Value to Evaluate Malignancy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨外周血生物标志物或联合检测对前列腺癌鉴别诊断的作用,并分析标志物在前列癌不同恶性程度间的差异性。方法回顾性分析2015年1月至2016年12月于中国医学科学院肿瘤医院就诊的126例前列腺癌(prostate cancer,PCa)患者和34例前列腺增生(benign prostatic hyperplasia,BPH)患者的临床资料,应用Logistic回归和受试者工作特征曲线(ROC)分析前列腺疾病患者的外周血生物标志物或多指标联合分析对前列腺癌鉴别诊断的价值。按照前列腺癌恶性程度分组对各指标进行差异分析。结果绘制各指标用于鉴别前列腺癌和前列腺增生的ROC结果显示总前列腺特异抗原(tPSA)和游离/总前列腺特异抗原(fPSA/tPSA)及血小板/淋巴细胞(PLR)的曲线下面积(AUC)最大。Logistic回归和ROC曲线分析结果提示:tPSA和fPSA/tPSA联合分析诊断效能最佳(AUC为0.76),联合PLR不能提高tPSA和fPSA/tPSA对前列腺癌鉴别诊断效能。前列腺癌不同恶性程度组间差异性分析结果显示:在126例前列癌患者中,外周血PLR和中性粒/淋巴细胞(NLR)在不同tPSA及临床分期间存在组间差异(P<0.05),乳酸脱氢酶(LDH)在前列腺癌不同恶性程度分组间未见明显差异。结论外周血生物标志物tPSA和fPSA/tPSA联合分析对前列腺癌鉴别诊断价值最大,外周血PLR和NLR可辅助tPSA、Gleason评分和临床分期评估前列腺癌的恶性程度,对前列腺癌恶性程度评判具有一定的提示作用。 Objective This study aimed to evaluate the difference of the application of peripheral blood biomarkers in the differential diagnosis of prostate cancer. Methods Clinical data of 126 patients with prostate cancer (PCa) and 34 patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) in National Cancer Hospital between January 2015 and December 2016 was retrospectively collected. Logistic regression and ROC curves were used to explore the diagnostic value of markers in peripheral blood. The differences of markers were analyzed according to the malignant degree of prostate cancer. Results The results of ROC curve to distinguish BPH and PCa showed showed that the AUC of tPSA, fPSA/tPSA and PLR were the largest. The results of Logistic regression and ROC curve analysis of combined markers showed that the diagnostic efficiency of tPSA and fPSA/tPSA combined analysis was the best with AUC = 0. 76. Comparisons among different degrees of malignant groups in 126 patients with PCa,PLR and NLR in peripheral blood showed significant differences among different tPSA and clinical classifications ( P 〈 0.05 ). There was no significant difference in LDH among different degree of malignant groups. Conclusion Our results suggested that combined-analysis of tPSA and fPSA/tPSA had the best diagnostic efficiency for BPH and PCa. PLR and NLR in peripheral blood can assist tPSA, Gleason scoring and clinical staging to assess the malignancy of prostate cancer and have potenialpositive effects on evaluating malignancy.
作者 梁彩霞 郑翠玲 肖泽均 林华 谭巧云 刘书霞 石远凯 韩晓红 LIANG Cai- xia;ZHENG Cui- ling;XIAO Ze-jun;LIN Hua;TAN Qiao- yun;LIU Shu- xia;SHI Yuan- kai;HAN Xiao- hong(Department of Medical Oncology, Beijing Key Laboratory of Clinical Study on Anticancer Molecular Targeted Drugs;Department of Clinical Laboratory;Department of Urinary Surgery;Department of Medical Records, National Cancer Center/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China)
出处 《标记免疫分析与临床》 CAS 2018年第6期766-771,共6页 Labeled Immunoassays and Clinical Medicine
基金 公益性行业科研专项(编号:201402001)
关键词 总前列腺特异性抗原 游离前列腺特异性抗原与总前列腺特异性抗原比值 中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值 血小板与淋巴细胞比值 乳酸脱氢酶 前列腺疾病 Total prostate- specific antigen Free/total prostate- specific antigen Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio Platelet to lymphocyte ratio Lactate dehydrogenase Prostate disease
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献8

共引文献2

同被引文献109

引证文献14

二级引证文献55

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部