期刊文献+

道德发展理论的新突破——道德基础理论解析 被引量:4

New Breakthroughs in the Study of Theories of Moral Development——An Analysis of Moral Foundations Theory
下载PDF
导出
摘要 道德发展理论在根本上制约着道德教育理论与实践的发展。20世纪60年代以来,认知发展理论在世界道德心理学领域一直居于统治地位,但近年来随着道德心理学的迅速发展,尤其是"道德基础理论"的提出,道德心理学界对道德起源与发展这一根本问题的认识实现了重大突破。美国心理学家海特等人研究提出了道德基础理论的动因。道德基础理论是批判继承道德认知发展理论思想,以史威德道德三元论和菲斯克道德四元论为基础,整合文化心理学、进化心理学、认知神经科学道德研究新成果的产物。道德基础理论实现了对道德基础二元论、道德判断理性论、道德熟思主要功能定位的突破,同时也面临研究方法、研究视野、理论功效方面的质疑。 Moral Development Theory basically constrains the development of theories and practices of moral education.Since 1960s, Cognitive Development Theory of Morality has occupied a critical position in the field of worldwide moral psychology.However, in re- cent years, with the rapid development of moral psychology, especially the proposal of Mor- al Foundations Theory, moral psychology scholars achieved a great breakthrough in the rec- ognition of the fundamental issue of the origin and development of morality.The American psychologists such as Jonathan Haidt, who put forward the Moral Fundamental Theory.Mor- al Fundamental Theory, based on Moral Theory of Ternary and Moral Theory of Quaternion, criticize and Inherits Moral Cognition Theory and absorb the essence of cultural psycholo- gy, evolutionary psychology and cognitive neuroscience.The moral foundation changes ac- cording to various periodical social challenges.Moral Fundation Theory makes great achievements in defining the main functions of Moral Theory of Duality, Moral Judgment and The Moral Deliberation.Meanwhile, it is confronted with doubts in research methodolo- gy, research perspective and theoretical effects.
作者 刘志 LIU Zhi(Ideological and Political Education Research Center, Northeast Normal University, ChangChun 130024, China)
出处 《外国教育研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2018年第5期68-80,共13页 Studies in Foreign Education
基金 吉林省教育厅社会科学研究规划课题"大学生创业伦理培育问题研究"(项目编号:JJKH20170937SK)
关键词 道德基础理论 问题源起 思想逻辑 突破 争议 Moral Foundations Theory Origin Logical Thought Breakthroughs Disputes
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献60

  • 1Batson,C. D. , Thompson, E. R. , Seuferling, G. , Whit- ney, H. , & Strongman, J. A. (1999 ). Moral hypocrisy: Ap- pearing moral to oneself without being so. Journal of Per- sonality and Social Psychology,77(3),525-537. 被引量:1
  • 2Blum,L. (2013). Political identity and moral education: A response to Jonathan Haidt's The Righteous Mind. Jour- nal of Moral Education ,42(3) ,298-315. 被引量:1
  • 3Baril,G. L. , & Wright,J. C. (2012). Different types of moral cognition: Moral stages versus moral foundations. Personality and Individual Differences, 53 (4), 468 - 473. 被引量:1
  • 4Cai,W. ,Huang,X. ,Wu,S. , & Kou, Y. (2015). Dis- honest behavior is not affected by an image of watching eyes. Evolution and Human Behavior ,36(2), 110- 116. 被引量:1
  • 5Carlo,G. ,Mestre,M. V. ,Samper,P. ,Tur,A. , & Ar- menta,B. E. (2010). The longitudinal relations among di- mensions of parenting styles,sympathy,prosocial moral rea- soning, and prosocial behaviors. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 35 (2), 116 - 124. 被引量:1
  • 6Chapman,H. A. ,Kirn,D. A. , Susskind,J. M. , & An- derson,A. K. (2009). In bad taste:Evidence for the oral ori- gins of moral disgust. Science, 323 (5918), 1222- 1226. 被引量:1
  • 7Christensen,J. F. , & Gomila,A. (2012). Moral dilem- mas in cognitive neuroscienee of moral decision-making: a principled review. Neuroscience Biobehavioral Reviews, 36 (4),1249-1264. 被引量:1
  • 8Cornwell,J. F. , & Higgins, E. T. (2014). Locomotion concerns with moral usefulness:When liberals endorse con- servative binding moral foundations. Journal of Experi- mental Social Psychology, 50,109- 117. 被引量:1
  • 9Cushman,F. , & Greene,J. D. (2012). Finding faults: how moral dilemmas illuminate cognitive structure. Social Neuroscience , 7 (3), 269 - 279. 被引量:1
  • 10Deloache,J. S. , & Lobue, V. (2009). The narrow fel- low in the grass:human infants associate snakes and fear. Developmental Science, 12 ( 1 ), 201 - 207. 被引量:1

共引文献13

同被引文献83

引证文献4

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部