期刊文献+

小切口阑尾切除术治疗急性阑尾炎的临床疗效观察 被引量:11

Clinical Observation of Mini-incision Appendectomy in the Treatment of Acute Appendicitis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:观察分析小切口阑尾切除用于临床急性阑尾炎的治疗效果。方法:以2015年4月至2017年5月期间广州市增城区仙村镇卫生院行手术治疗的120例急性阑尾炎者为研究对象,根据临床手术治疗方式不同分为两组,其中对照组58例(传统阑尾切除治疗)、观察组62例(行小切口阑尾切除术),比较两组患者治疗情况(切口长度、术中出血、手术耗时、排气时间等),术后不良事件发生情况和治疗效果满意度。结果:观察组较对照组住院、手术及排气用时短,切口长度短、出血量少,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组较对照组患者手术治疗满意度高,术后不良反应发生少,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:临床对急性阑尾炎患者治疗时选择小切口阑尾切除治疗,患者手术时间短、术后恢复效果好、不良反应少,手术治疗效果患者满意度高。 Objective To observe the clinical feasibility of mini-incision appendectomy in the treatment of acute appendicitis Method 120 patients with acute appendicitis treated from April 2015 to May 2017 in our hospital were selected. The subjects were divided into control group (58 cases) and observation group (62 cases) according to the different therapies. The control group received the conventional appendectomy; the observation group received the mini-incision appendectomy. The operation conditions (length of incision, intraoperative bleeding volume, operation time, exhaust time) as well as the adverse event rate and clinical satisfaction were compared. Result The hospitalization time, operation time, exhaust time, length of incision and intraoperative bleeding volume for observation group were significantly better than control group (P 〈 0.05); compared with control group, the observation group had the higher clinical satisfaction and lower adverse event rate (P 〈 0.05). Conclusion For patients with acute appendicitis, the mini-incision appendectomy is featured as shorter operation time, better recovery effect, lower adverse event rate and higher clinical satisfaction.
作者 徐雪峰 黄炳成 XU Xue-feng;HUANG Bing-cheng(Xiancun Town Health Center, Guangdong Guangzhou 511335;Xintang Town Hospital, Guangdong Guangzhou 511340)
出处 《深圳中西医结合杂志》 2018年第5期89-91,共3页 Shenzhen Journal of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine
关键词 急性阑尾炎 小切口阑尾切除术 不良反应 Acute appendicitis Mini-incision appendectomy Adverse reactions
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献39

  • 1高根五,夏志平,姚榛祥.临床普通外科学[M].沈阳:沈阳出版社,2004. 被引量:2
  • 2吴阶平 裘法祖主编.黄家驷外科学[M].北京:人民出版社,1994.26-27. 被引量:55
  • 3Richards W, Watson D, Lynch G, et al. A review of the re-sults of lap- aroscopic versus open appendectomy[J]. Surgery Gynecology and Obs- tetrics, 1993,177(5):473-48. 被引量:1
  • 4Aziz N, Fahey JL, Detels R, et al. Analytical performance of a highly sensitive Creactive protein-based immunoassay and the effects of labo- ratory variables on levels of protein in blood[J]. Clinical and Diagnos- tic Laboratory Immunology, 2003, 10(4): 652-657. 被引量:1
  • 5Tsao K J, St Peter SD, Valusek PA, et al. Adhesive small bowel obstruc- tion after appendectomy in children: Comparison between the laparoseo- pic and open approch [J]. Journal of Pediatric Surgery, 2007,42 (6): 939-942. 被引量:1
  • 6P. Cervini, L.C. Smith, D.R. Urbach. The surgeon on call is a strong f- actor determining the use of a laparoscopic approach for appendectom- y[J]. 2002,16(12): 1774-1777. 被引量:1
  • 7Sweeney K J, Keane FB. Moving from open to laparoscopicappendicect- omy[J]. British Journal of Surgery, 2003,90(3):257-258. 被引量:1
  • 8S Sauerland, R Lefering, E Neugebauer. Laparoseopic versus open sur- gery for suspected appendicitis[J]. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2004,4:CD001546. 被引量:1
  • 9Shalak F, Almulhim SI, Ghantous S, et al. Laparoseopic appen-decto- my:burden or benefit? A single-center experience [J]. Journal of Laparoendoscopic&Advanced Surgical Techniques. Part A, 2009,19 (3):427-429. 被引量:1
  • 10S Pandey, S Slawik, K Cross, et al. Laparoscopic appendicectomy: a training model for laparoscopic right hemicolectomy? [J]. Colorectal Disease, 2007,9(6):536-539. 被引量:1

共引文献102

同被引文献68

引证文献11

二级引证文献45

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部