期刊文献+

转变立场还是思维方式?——再论儿童文学中的“儿童本位论” 被引量:25

Changing the Position or Way of Thinking?——Further on “Child-Oriented Theory” in Children's Literature
下载PDF
导出
摘要 五四时期儿童本位论的确立是中国儿童文学走向现代的标志。这一理论不但颠覆了旧式儿童观,也奠定了现代儿童文学的理论基调,直到今天仍具有无可置疑的理论意义和实践效用。然而如果将其推向极端,就可能产生悖离初衷的负面效应。儿童本位论建立在儿童/成人具有本质差异的二分式假设之上,若片面强调其特殊性而淡化共性,将导致儿童文学成为儿童唯一能够阅读的文学以及只有儿童才阅读的文学。超越儿童本位论,其理论意义在于超越本位论。儿童本位论批判的实质不是立场批判,不是批判"以谁"为本位,而是思维方式的批判。儿童文学需要突破二元对立的现代性话语框架,尊重差异也认同共性,从本质主义的思维方式里走出来,走向问题,走向实践。 The establishment of child-oriented theory in the May Fourth Movement symbolized the modernization of Chinese children's literature. The theory not only subverted the traditional views on children but also laid the theoretical keynote for modern children's literature,and today it still has maintained undoubtedly its theoretical meaning and practical utility. However,this theory will probably produce negative effects contrary to our original intention if we apply it in an extreme way. The childoriented theory is based on the dichotomy hypothesis that children/adults have essential differences. If its particularity is emphasized one-sidedly and its commonness downplayed, it might result in children's literature becoming the only literature which children can read and the literature which only children read. The theoretical significance of transcending the "child-oriented " theory lies in the transcendence of the orientation theory. And the essence of the criticism of child-oriented theory is not to criticize standpoints,not to criticize "for whom " as the orientation,but to criticize the way of thinking. Children's literature needs to break through the modernity discourse framework of binary opposition,respect diversity and commonness,and come out of the essentialist way of thinking and go toward questioning and practicing.
作者 杜传坤 Du Chuankun(School of Education, Shandong Normal University, Jinan Shandong, 250014)
出处 《山东师范大学学报(人文社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2018年第1期36-43,共8页 Journal of Shandong Normal University(Humanities and Social Sciences)
基金 作者主持研究的国家社科基金项目"20世纪中国幼儿文学史论"(11CZW075)的阶段性成果
关键词 儿童文学 儿童本位论 现代性 二元对立 思维方式 children ' s literature child-oriented theory modernity binary opposition way of thinking
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献15

  • 1大卫·帕金翰.童年之死[M】.张建中译.北京:华夏出版社,2005. 被引量:5
  • 2[英]大卫·帕金翰.《童年之死》,张建中译,北京:华夏出版社,2005年版,第5页. 被引量:1
  • 3[日]柄古行人.《日本现代文学的起源》,赵京华译,北京:三联书店,2003年版,第125页,第220页. 被引量:1
  • 4胡适.《国语运动与国语教育》,1921年10月8日在安徽省对安庆教育界所作的演讲. 被引量:1
  • 5[英]齐格蒙·鲍曼.《立法者与阐释者》,洪涛译,上海:上海人民出版社,2000年版,第156页. 被引量:2
  • 6尼尔·波兹曼.童年的消逝[M].桂林:广西师范大学出版社,2004.. 被引量:42
  • 7[英]大卫·帕金翰,《童年之死》,张建中译,华夏出版社,2005:83—84.81.67,113,158,224,225—226 被引量:3
  • 8[美]尼尔·波兹曼.《童年的消逝》,吴燕莛译,桂林:广西师范大学出版社,2004年. 被引量:3
  • 9柯林·黑伍德.孩子的历史:从中世纪到现代的儿童与童年[M].黄煜文,译.台北:麦田出版社,2004. 被引量:1
  • 10柄古行人.日本现代文学的起源[M].赵京华,译.北京:生活·读书·新知三联书店,2003. 被引量:1

共引文献11

同被引文献223

引证文献25

二级引证文献67

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部