摘要
解决指导性案例"援引难"问题的关键在于明确其法源地位。指导性案例的"指导性"功能是该法源地位产生的基础,并同时作为案例运用的理据。"指导性"功能是指导案例所具有的内部效能,在实践中展现为清晰法律、补充法律和创设规则等三个方面。其中,补充法律功能具有最广泛应用性,其实质是通过法律解释来发掘裁判规则。在此功能指引下,指导性案例运用必须满足区分"适用的规则"与"规则的适用"、结合案件产生背景提炼和运用裁判规则、突破"一案一释"以实现解释效力的普适性等要求。
The key to solving the problem of ＂citing difficulty＂ in guiding cases is to clarify the legal status. The ＂guiding＂ function of a guiding case is the foundation of the generation of the legal status, and at the same time is also the rationale for the guiding case application. The ＂guiding＂ function is the internal effectiveness of guiding the case, which is in practice shown in such three aspects as clarifying law, supplementing law and stipulating rules. Among them, its supplementary legal function has the most extensive application, whose essence is to explore the rules of referees through legal interpretation. Under the guidance of this function, the application of guiding cases must meet the requirements of distinguishing ＂applicable rules＂ and ＂rules application＂, combining the background of the case to refine and apply case rules, and breaking through ＂one case and one interpretation＂ to achieve universality of interpretation effectiveness.
作者
宋菲
SONG Fei(Graduate School of Education, East China University of Political Science and Law, Shanghai 200042, Chin)
出处
《中南大学学报（社会科学版）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2018年第3期34-41,共8页
Journal of Central South University：Social Sciences
基金
中国法学会青年调研项目"法律解释方法运用实证研究"(CLS(2017)Y09)
