摘要
从世界范围来看,绝大多数国家的最高法院均有形式各异、范围有别的司法规则创制权。大陆法系国家一般是通过法律解释来填补法律的漏洞,从而完成法律之续造,其实质是创制实体性规则;而英美法系国家的普通法本身就是法官的创造物。无论是大陆法系国家还是英美法系国家,基于司法的独立性与自主性之要求,根据宪法或法律之授权,其最高法院均享有程序性司法规则的创制权。我国在充分尊重立法权,并与司法解释权相区别的前提下,有必要赋予最高人民法院司法规则创制权。创制司法规则需要遵循相应的原则与程序。
At the global level,the majority of nations＇ supreme courts have judicial rules initiatives with different forms and scopes.In civil law jurisdictions,a common approach is to fix the legal loopholes by judicial interpretation so as to further develop the law,with the essence of establishing new substantive rules.Compared to the civil approach,the common law itself is the judge-made law.Based on the requirements of judicial independence and autonomy,in both civil law jurisdictions and common law jurisdictions,their Supreme Courts have been authorized by their constitutions or other laws to legally execute the judicial rule initiatives.On the premise that the legislative power is valued and is discriminated from the judicial interpretation power,it is necessary to authorize the judicial rules initiatives to the Supreme People＇s Court.It should be noted that the corresponding principles and procedures are needed to initiate judicial rules.
出处
《中国法学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2011年第3期21-30,共10页
China Legal Science
