摘要
高罗佩的《大唐狄公案》在展现腾挪顿挫、峰回路转的推理断案情节之时,也存在着若干缺乏现实理据性的非真实化情节。这种艺术缺憾,既是侦探推理小说本身在生活理据性与情节戏剧性的微妙冲突之间两难择取的某种外化,更是由高罗佩在这部作品中所欲传达的文化、思想蕴涵的丰富性与多元性所决定的。从正反两面客观辩证地认识这一"白璧之瑕",对于全面立体地考量、探究《大唐狄公案》乃至高罗佩本人丰富广博的汉学思想亦具有不可低估的特殊意义。
A Judge Dee Mystery,written by Robert van Gulik,the Dutch sinologist,has intricate plots of reasoning and Judgments. At the same time,there are some untruthful plots,which are the external reflection of dilemma to choose in confliction between the rational reality and the dramatic plots in detective fiction,and which are originated from the abundant culture and diverse thoughts Gulik intends to convey in this novel. It is of great significance to consider the merit and demerit of the works objectively and dialectically for studying A Judge Dee Mystery and Gulik＇s extensive sinological thinking.
作者
王凡
WANG Fan(College of Literature, Shandong Normal University, Jinan Shandong 250014, Chin)
出处
《吕梁学院学报》
2018年第1期5-9,共5页
Journal of Lyuiang University
关键词
《大唐狄公案》
侦探推理小说
情节失真
高罗佩
A Judge Dee Mystery
detective fiction
unreality of plots
Robert van Gulik
