摘要
目的:观察两种不同雾化吸入方式治疗婴幼儿急性支气管肺炎的效果。方法:将180例急性支气管肺炎的患儿随机分为两组。两组患儿均给予常规综合治疗,对照组在常规综合治疗的基础上给予电动雾化吸入治疗,观察组在常规综合治疗的基础上给予氧驱动雾化吸入治疗。结果:观察组在显效率、总有效率、临床体征改善等方面均显著优于对照组(P<0.05)。结论:氧驱动雾化吸入治疗婴幼儿急性支气管肺炎疗效明显,对患儿刺激性小,患儿耐受性好。
Objective：To compare the different curative effects in the atomizing inhalation therapy with infant bronchopneumonia. Methods： 180 infant patients with acute bronchopneumonia were randomly divided into two groups. The two groups were taken same general clinical therapy. Besides that, the neonatal patients in control group used electrically driven atomizing inhalation for treatment, and the infant patients in experimental group used oxygen driven atomizing inhalation. Results： The significant efficiency, the total efficiency and the improvement in clinical symptom in experimental group were significantly more effective than control group（ P 〈 0.05）. Conclusion： The oxygen driven atomizing inhalation is more effective in infant bronchopneumonia. And there is little amyctic and more compliance in infant patients.
作者
罗大佳
Luo Dajia(The Second Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui Chin)
出处
《中外女性健康研究》
2018年第9期102-103,共2页
Women＇s Health Research
关键词
支气管肺炎
雾化吸入
婴幼儿
Bronchopneumonia
Atomizing inhalation
Infant
